Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 December 11

Consistency

 * Is there any consistency? Once a discussion is "closed"... is there a way to compare NewMusicBox and The Adventures of Captain Proton? Considering the former is retained in a short version (non-spam) where it's mostly referencing itself and is a stub, versus the latter that was referenced through different episodes (directly or indirectly) of a well-known TV show and was of significant length. (I won't even start about the deletion in spite of no consensus to delete.) With such unbelievable inconsistency applied through Wikipedia and hyper-proactive admins (in many situations, but by no means all or necessarily even most), how is one to know when an article should even warrant the time of day? (Side note: since it's unreferenced and terribly tagged, should fuzzy dice be put through PROD, AfD, or even Speedy Deletion? Just wondering, since "we" are on this seeming spree of deleting much larger, more notable, significant, and referenced articles... trying to find that consistency point.) VigilancePrime (talk) 04:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)