Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 December 9

Afdanons
Please leave the notice, there was an spa post. M er cury   00:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, then remove it. There's no need for a boilerplate notice for just one SPA. Sean William @ 00:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * One spa post is no problem, and a tag'll not stop 'em anyway. That particlar lump of horror is only useful if a forum/gamesite/whatever has mandated its members to come here and ballot stuff. It's not useful, and really just adds clutter to a debate where near everybody is here meaningfully. It has no effect whatever on people who would misuse accounts in the way you describe. Splash - tk 00:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I think there is, but if more than one person wants it removed, I'll leave it removed. M er cury    00:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Yuck, why wasn't that thing deleted ages ago. Take it away unless strictly necessary. SPAs are not detered by these things, if they find themselves this deep into wikiland they are pretty determined. --Docg 00:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Moved

 * Note: the editor who started the last AFD (User:Durova) claims to have done this at Angela's request; however, Angela denies having made this request. Confusing, no?  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  11:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Other Note: Where do you get a denial of a deletion request out of that? And why are you posting to the top of this discussion?  M er cury    11:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I think this was clarified during the AfD. Angela does wish it deleted and had consistently done so. Whether she explicitly asked for this AfD is neither here nor there.--Docg 11:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, well that clears things up.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  11:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope, I've restored the discussion back to DRV project page. Please do not move it again.  M er cury    11:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Brandt DRV
We've now has on the Angela DRV 4 attempts at closers by involved or otherwise problematic admins. Can we please have who ever closes Brandt be completely uninvolved, possibly a regular DRV closer? JoshuaZ (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Xoloz has closed it. And whilst the decision is regrettable - I respect it as valid, indeed inevitable. The matter rests (for now)--Docg 14:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Deletion review/Log/2007 December 18. People were mislead about what happened here. -- Ned Scott 12:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * For those that might still have this watchlisted and be interested in either clarifying their views or giving new ones, Deletion review/Log/2008 March 24. -- Ned Scott 06:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)