Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2009 February 3

I may have messed up something here, but I can't seem to post this comment:


 * Overturn speedy relist at AfD as needed. It clearly isn't a speedy candidate at the moment.  Just recreation would have been a fair way to do it, as a speedy based on recreated content would be bogus.  Also any argument that things need be done by "established editors" imply to me a lack of understanding of the purpose of wikipedia.  Arguments of COI and spamming are also largely irrelevant if the article meets our guidelines.  This one is debatable, but a quick news search turned up things at booklist and the like, beyond what's already there. I think the topic is above the bar and this article is a reasonable (and not spammy) stub.  Perhaps the specific devices reviewed should be here instead, but I think putting it all under one company makes more sense.  Hobit (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I inserted the comment correctly; it seems you put it in the wrong spot. Your !vote shows up just fine now. Firestorm (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)