Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2016 November 12

RfC about Black Metaphor article meeting Music Bio guidelines
Does the endorsement of deletion for the Black Metaphor article justify an overzealous deletion decision? “Deletion of an article on an inherently notable subject contradicts the overall goal of the project” per, Overzealous Deletion. Peacemvmt1 (talk) 01:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Survey

 * Support The Black Metaphor article follows the notability and verifiability guidelines of WP:MUSIC Peacemvmt1 (talk) 01:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Threaded discussion
There has already an AfD about this article and there is an ongoing DRV. This RfC is pointless, bordering on disruptive, and the wording is completely inappropriate. Can someone please close this? Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * RfCs are a way to attract more attention to a discussion about making changes to pages or procedures, including articles, essays, guidelines, policies, and many other kinds of pages. It uses a system of centralized noticeboards and random, bot-delivered invitations to advertise discussions to uninvolved editors.


 * Include a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue in the talk page section.
 * How is this disruptive? Please explain. Peacemvmt1 (talk) 10:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If there is an ongoing discussion elsewhere, then a second open discussion on the same matter goes against WP:MULTI, whether it is a formal WP:RFC or not. -- Red rose64 (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)