Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2018 July 14

just to follow-up on your question, Why was this message deleted?, the answer is that it was a mal-fuctioning bot. We have a number of bits of automated software (known as bots, short for robots), which perform routine tasks. It looks like when you first asked your question, it wasn't formatted with the correct headers. That's not normally a major problem, but it confused one of the bots, which accidentally deleted it instead of fixing the headers. I've pinged the maintainer of the bot to alert them. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

I've been trying now for a while to find someone civil to have a discussion about the situation on the Ethan van Sciver page, but no one has been presented. When I attempted to explain that the editor in question had asked for a source, I provided it. I provided 5 sources. But then they deleted the sources. So honestly, I'm under the impression that you're all running a dictatorship here, going back and forth on deciding what information is allowed to be information and what's not. I've already requested that have his editor privileges revoked, to no avail. If this is the reaction that I'm receiving from the editors, then I'm afraid nothing more need be said. I won't be using this website anymore.

MontChevalier (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)