Wikipedia talk:Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack

Well said. giggy (O) 07:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The article could be a little more verbose...but it does well enough at describing what so often does happen in real life just as well. Gnorthup (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC) P.S. If you want, I'll work on a little essay that will be more verbose and descriptive :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnorthup (talk • contribs) 18:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a wiki... The Evil Spartan (talk) 03:55, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Logic
By the logic of this essay, you should never accuse someone of a personal attack to begin with. PSWG1920 (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

"Irony" unhelpful
Hi, I read: ... And around and around the argument goes, irony abounds, and everyone ... But the irony-reference does not help me anywhere, not understanding anything. I suggest the refernce is skipped (no effect on readibility at all!). I prefer a good example (or 10). -DePiep (talk) 21:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Application of AGF?
I removed the nutshell a little while ago, figuring that the page as is is so short that there's just no point to an even shorter summary. Now, I note that it ended with "In other words, always assume good faith." Should that be integrated into the essay? PSWG1920 (talk) 08:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Title
I can't make sense of this article's title. Is it meant to be "Don't accuse someone of making a personal attack when they accuse someone of making a personal attack"? 212.84.103.144 (talk) 06:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * More don't accuse someone of making a personal attack because they have just accused you of making a personal attack.--Banana (talk) 03:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)