Wikipedia talk:Education program archive/New York University/Copyright, Commerce, and Culture (Spring 2013)/Timeline

Timeline
This course will be focusing on editing Wikipedia as both authors and educated copyright consumers. While you will be required to write your own original content, I am also expecting you to make an effort to add other work authored by someone else to the articles you choose to work on. I want you to engage directly with the copyright implications of such reuse, while understanding and respecting Wikipedia’s policies on the subject.

The steps involved will be as follows:

You will create a Wikipedia account, create a user page, and add a link to that user page to our course page. You may wish to add some biographical information to your user page, but it can have as much or as little content as you like; for examples, you can check out the user page of our Wikipedia Ambassador, Richard Knipel.

During the first month of class, you will attend tutorial sessions with our Wikipedia Campus Ambassador to familiarize yourselves with the editing process and community guidelines of Wikipedia. These sessions will meet in Bobst Library, and they are mandatory. There will be multiple times offerred to accomodate your schedules.

You will need to find an article or group of articles to focus your work on. This area can either be a copyright issue that we’ve covered in the course or another policy issue you’ve done some research on in the past. It can even be a person, place, or thing you have a personal connection to, e.g. your home town. Articles about works of fiction are problematic because they tend to be dominated by plot synopses; we'll need to discuss any such article you want to work on.

If possible, it’s best to choose an article that is specific and underdeveloped; many more general articles are already well-maintained. That said, you also have to be mindful of the need to support your content with references to quality sources, i.e. those that can be expected to have a fact-checking process. Working on an article that can only be supported with forum posts and tweets will be a frustrating exercise.

Assignment #1
For your first assignment, you will write a short assessment of your chosen article. You should address each of the following criteria with examples drawn from the article when appropriate: Coverage: Determine what content is missing from the article. Does the article cover the important aspects of the topic? References: Assess the quality of the cited sources. Are the sources of high quality relative to what is available? Neutrality: Is the article written from a neutral point of view? Readability: Is the article readable and well written? Formatting: Does the article adhere to the Wikipedia Manual of Style?

Assignment #2
For your second assignment, you’ll compile a bibliography of the sources and content you will use to add to the article. This will require research on your part to identify the best references for the information you wish to add or edit. For instance, while you may have read it in a blog post, if that post refers to a separate primary source, it is that source that you need to use as a reference for the Wikipedia article. For content that you propose reusing in the article, you should assess its copyright status. Does it have an explicit license attached to it, or is it likely to be “all rights reserved”? Is it original (and recent) enough to be protected by copyright?

Assignment #3
For your third assignment, you’ll create an outline or summary of what you propose to add to the article. Remember to maintain a neutral point of view, and for your reused content, ensure that your use meets Wikipedia’s Non-Free Content requirements. This will be a good point to seek feedback from our Wikipedia ambassador and/or a Wikipedia mentor on whether your summary meets Wikipedia’s requirements.

Final Assignment
For your final assignment, you will make your edits to the live Wikipedia article and email me a link to your revision. You should contribute at least 1000 words of original content, with additional credit available for reused content and diligent sourcing. You will be graded on the quality of your edits, which will include both an evaluation of your writing and an evaluation of your sources and reused content. While you are encouraged to engage in the discussion on the Talk page and advocate for your edits if they are reverted, your grade will not depend on whether your edits persist in the article.

([ Click to return to your main course page and continue.])