Wikipedia talk:Essay directory

"List of Wikipedia essays" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Wikipedia essays. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –xenotalk 13:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

What is Editor Retention?
WER is a group of farmers. Like all farmers, it isn't a binary job, but rather one in which you do good work and you will get good results. Put a little more effort into it, and you will get better results, etc. Our first focus is on the soil, the medium in which our crop grows. We try to give Wikipedia better soil, a better environment, so that good things will grow from it. We do this by encouraging policies that help new users, and ones that make it possible for blocked users to come back if we reasonably believe they will be an asset. We improve the soil by helping out in dispute and content resolution, by welcoming new users, and taking the time to help someone. It all starts with the soil, the foundation, the overall environment at Wikipedia. The more people you have working the soil, the better that soil is likely to be. Editor of the Week and other programs like the T-shirt giveaway (which isn't WER but does the same function) is like fertilizer. it takes existing editors and makes them stronger, more vigorous. This has additional benefits, we have learned, in that it helps us identify new leaders, as we have several admin come from the program. The crop is articles; the primary product that Wikipedia produces, and the only reason it exists. Reading is the harvest. The beautiful part is that the crop is infinite. It is literally like an apple tree that never runs out of fruit. Once we have retained excellent editors, and they produce well written and sourced prose, it is available to be enjoyed by 1 person or 100 million. The most important Wikipedian IS the reader, and they reap the greatest reward from a competent editor retention program. Keeping high value talent here means better accuracy and sourcing, more readable prose, all on a well maintained page. While it is easy to think about the individual editors we try to assist so they can be happy, productive members of Wikipedia, it is important to remember that all our work here at WER, just like all the editing, admin'ing, coding and even the people running payroll at the Foundation, is all about and for the reader. From Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The dustbin
By which I mean the standard structure of the first sentence of the lead:  . The title is followed by a parenthesised list of abbreviations, alternative names, pronunciations, pronunciations in other languages and varieties of English, and on to Uncle Tom Cobley. Conventionally, biographical articles may include the subject's dates, as in Sergei Rachmaninoff (1873-1943), but as that example shows, this gets expanded and expanded, and finally moved into footnotes. I recall reading an essay about this problem, but cannot find it now. Can anyone help? Imaginatorium (talk) 04:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Correction Sorry, I may have broken the rules, if it looks as though I am seeking help. Of course I am not seeking help, I am suggesting that this page should be modified in such a way that I can find the essay... Imaginatorium (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah well, perhaps the way this page might be improved is by mentioning other places one might recall reading an essay: it turns out this was here: Wikipedia_Signpost/2017-06-09/Op-ed Imaginatorium (talk) 19:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)