Wikipedia talk:FAC coordination

Natwhal
I am ready to archive this. No one who has looked at the source to text fidelity is happy with it, see Jens, UC and Roy. Roy has now formally opposed. I am pausing for 24 hours in case any of you disagree. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No disagreement from me. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Wait, can someone do one last spot check and if it fails you can archive it. At least give it another week. Wolverine XI   ( talk to me ) 16:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I have just jumped my own gun and archived it. The more I looked at it, the less happy I felt., I don't think that you understand how important the issues being raised are, how seriously they are taken, nor how unhappy coordinators become when you make a change in response to a reviewer comment which fails to address it. You need to listen to the reviewers, they are correct. "In order to spare the previous reviewers some inconvenience, I would appreciate it if you could refrain from pinging them." is not the way to go. Apologies if this comes across as blunt or worse, but after four nominations this year, I am reminded of the old definition of insanity. Something needs to change. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Yo, ! You didn't get a week. You didn't get 24 hours. You got two minutes. A bit of a coffee/keyboard interface moment there! :) cheers,   ——Serial Number 54129  09:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * What should I do? I think the only way this article is going to pass is if it receives a pre-FAC source review. If you know anyone who's willing to take the job, please let me know. Wolverine XI   ( talk to me ) 06:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Wolverine XI, I recommend that you thoroughly check the entirety of the sources and once you're done, you could locate an editor (maybe Roy) who can spot-check the sources for you pre-FAC to make sure the fifth nomination runs as smoothly as possible. FrB.TG (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)