Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Mereka Bilang, Saya Monyet!/archive1

Addressed comments from TBrandley
Comments


 * You need to add alt text to the article's images per WP:ALT; it should briefly explain the contents of the image itself
 * Not necessary at FAC, but added anyways.


 * Try to avoid pipe links per WP:PIPELINK
 * Any cases in your opinion which do not follow WP:PIPELINK? Tempo (Indonesian magazine) will certainly not read well without a pipe, and I consider it awkward to rephrase a sentence so that Child sexual abuse is not piped.


 * "wide" worldwide?
 * National. Based on my experience, probably 3 January in Jakarta, then spreading out over a couple of weeks, so adding "Indonesia-wide" would not be correct as it was certainly not screened in Papua on the same day, if ever.
 * For what it's worth, "wide" releases in film are generally just contrasted with limited releases; a wide release doesn't have a set definition in so much as it just means "widely available for viewing". Lawless (film) had a "wide" release but I had to travel a few towns out to find a cinema which was even showing it once a day. GRAPPLE   X  01:07, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Unlink US% per WP:OVERLINK
 * Done


 * Remove bolding from award titles in the award table per MOS:BOLD by adding  to the table coding
 * Done


 * "Best Film" is missing recipient, the film itself add there to clarify things
 * Not done. It is implicit as this is an article about the film. Recipient is meant to indicate a person. See Ruma Maida and ? (film), which also use this format.


 * "There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view." from the automatic peer reviewer
 * Any specific complaints? Any opinions that I see are credited to their holds, except for the Sastra wangi one which is a fairly common view
 * It showed the word, "is considered" what is about that? TBrandley 01:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It's referring to sastra wangi, which multiple sources list her as a member of. Now, Djenar does not agree with the label, hence the "considered" — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * "You may wish to convert your form of references to the cite.php footnote system that WP:WIAFA 1(c) highly recommends." from automatic peer reviewer
 * Long argument short, WIAFA 1c does not recommend a specific style.
 * That's fine. Just a bot that did that automaticly, thought I'd add it I didn't see anything myself. Just a bot.

TBrandley 00:52, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking into this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)