Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Stone Mountain Memorial half dollar/archive1


 * a huge rock - Is "huge" encyclopedic?
 * To my mind, yes. Adjectives are permitted by the MOS. It's a very very big rock.
 * So long as you believe "huge" is a formal term. I have my doubts, but I'll put them to peace for now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Academie Julian - Worth a link?
 * Mares of Diomedes - Worth a link?
 * Any of the individuals in the first paragraph of Inception notable?
 * Plane probably is, but I don't think redlinking her is a good idea. You pick your fights on redlinking. If this were an article about the UDC, I might feel differently.


 * 20 ft square. - Ambiguous, perhaps 20 sqft or 400 sqft to be unambiguous.
 * I believe that a somewhat larger figure for the metric would have been expressed had area been intended. Still, I've made a change.


 * Why is Plane referred to as "Mrs. Plane" throughout?
 * See peer review.
 * Okay, my bad. Why do you use the honorific "Mrs." instead of just saying "Plane" as you do for the men? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * She's only referred to that way twice … I felt "Plane" by itself sounds a bit odd.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Alabama Centennial half dollar - Notable?
 * Borglum was busy between the passage of the bill and the end of May 1924 first with the Children's Founders Roll medal, and then with the half dollar.  - Confused as to what you are trying to say here
 * In all, Borglum made nine plaster models for the design. - A footnote about what was standard at the time may prove enlightening
 * I'm not aware of any statistics being kept on the matter. Obviously a minimum of two, but I have no sources and I doubt records are complete. Many Mint records were destroyed in the 1970s, alas.


 * Stonewall Jackson -> Why Stonewall here (yes, I know it's his nickname, but I don't recall it showing up earlier)
 * Changed to "General". We call Lee "General" once.  Jackson by itself may escapt the reader.


 * Both Borglum and the Association made accusations of graft; - Semi-colon doesn't feel right here.
 * I've tweaked the sentence to make the connection a bit clearer.


 * That's it for today. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Matters not addressed have been dealt with. Thank you for your comments.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see any of the changes (did you save?) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * the South, including Oklahoma and the District of Columbia. - Don't quite think D.C. is "the South" as implied by this wording (my knowledge of US geography is lacking, so I can't say anything about Oklahoma). Perhaps another word, instead of "including"?
 * The Atlanta lawyer, a Democrat, - Didn't you mention his leanings earlier?
 * That's it... very good job. Comment though... do we have articles on any commemoratives which actually raised the money they were meant to? I think all of yours that I've reviewed were abject failures. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, Elgin, Illinois, Centennial half dollar there was no scandal, everything was done properly, and there were still problems,but at lease everyone was honest. I think that's fourth or fifth in line for FAC. Thanks, I'll work though your remaining comments.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * All those are done (and I got a loss of session data message before, and it's saved now).--Wehwalt (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)