Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Texas A&M University/archive2

A place for your reply. Buffs (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "The FAC coordinators determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FA status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the coordinators determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the coordinators:
 * consensus for promotion has not been reached;
 * ... or
 * a nomination is unprepared, after at least one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn." Gog the Mild (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * a nomination is unprepared, after at least one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn." Gog the Mild (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * You stated the reason was "Given the strong opposes above I am archiving this." So, now I'm guessing between 3 rationales to address, none of which make much sense to me. Which one is it? A majority felt the nomination was well-prepared, so it clearly isn't "unprepared". How exactly do you propose I "reach consensus" if opposition is unwilling to discuss? I would expect a little more detail considering the majority of the people supported the nomination. Buffs (talk) 17:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Clarification would be appreciated. Buffs (talk) 15:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)