Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/The Carpenters/archive4

I have not started any discussion that "made things veer away from the job at hand". Please get your facts right. I was pinged to this page by Ritchie. I answered Ritchie's query. You then made a comment suggesting I have some 'other agenda' ("the editor seems to have/have had quite a few bones to pick with this article" etc.). I have subsequently asked questions as to why an addition I made to the article should have been removed; the answers given have shifted from one reason to another, and one particular question has not even been addressed: namely, why am I told that a single sentence - sourced from a NYT article - about the group's biggest hits (and Karen's voice) tending to inhabit sadness/loneliness must be removed because the article's getting too big, whereas very specific information about the song Mr Guder (which most readers will never have heard of) is allowed to be repeated? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 08:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I asked the question because no explanations from anyone seemed to suffice. When you were told that the text and reference given didn't match, you continued to say it did. You continued on and on and on (and still do) with walls of text-some of which deal with the text/reference and much which does not. I have my facts correct and my opinion still remains that all of this does not pertain to the article.  I have been accused of "forcing" you to do something; this is beginning to look like a very poor attempt at a soap opera instead of a review of this article.  It continues to look like you're upset because information added by you was removed by someone and you're willing to waste everyone's time because of it. We hope (talk) 10:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)