Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/The Heart of Thomas/archive1

Please open a peer review to continue comments, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  21:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The issue with the nomination was not the substance of the article but rather a lack of reviewers, so I'm unsure what a peer review would accomplish. As I was only given 40 minutes notice between a response by a reviewing editor and the closure of the FAC, I would rather just address the (easily resolvable) outstanding notes so they can be settled by the time I re-nominate the article. Morgan695 (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I will address that at Wt:fac when not ipad typing, but generally, this fac had NO lack of reviews. I recommend following up with a peer review rather than adding to a closed fac. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  21:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)