Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/York Park/archive4

2c review
Fifelfoo (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Has a publication date, "Wednesday, 18 October 2006" :"Relive Tassie football's glory days"
 * Deceptive: ""A History of Tasmanian Football".". Authored by  The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts.  Hosted at http://www.tassiefootyteam.com.au/.  Not exactly published by "Government of Tasmania"
 * Ah ... nice spot .. what do you suggest however?  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * author=The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts (Tas.) |publisher=tassiefootyteam.com.au ? Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Is a submission to a Senate inquiry, make explicit, ""Launceston City Council / York Park & Inveresk Precinct Authority Submission". " re: Parliament of Australia Senate Inquiry, Inquiry into matters relating to the establishment of an Australian Football League Team for Tasmania, Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport
 * Has an author, "Rod Morris", " "A Short History". Launceston City Cycling Club."
 * Grandstand fire deliberately lit has a byline, "AAP"
 * Citation of ABC inconsistent. Are we contracting or spelling out?
 * Spelling out. Done.  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hawks confirm Tasmanian deal has a wireline AAP
 * Melbourne wins friendly has a wireline AAP
 * Aurora changing shape has a byline Adam Smith
 * Lewis to beef up... has a byline ROGER VAUGHAN
 * check your Examiners, I don't have a sub
 * Neither.  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Damn. Just a tick.  Nope.  SLNSW, USYD, UNSW don't hold. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You may wish to indicate which subsection of ABC authored a component
 * Why not Tasmania has a byline David Davutovic
 * Full citation please: The Examiner, p. 1, 1959-03-18
 * Full citation please: The Examiner, p. 1, 2007-12-09
 * Info already existed when editing this article. Suggest we scrap info?  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If it doesn't need a citation, and the citation is poor... there's a solution implicit. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, sorry for the jargon. A byline is a by-line, the line which says who its by.  If the article is authored, its a very strong expectation that the author will be recognised.  Similarly, if the article came from a wire, a news service, like AAP, its customary to indicate this.  Personally, I'd chuck AAP in as the author, unless a separate author is listed.  If you can't get at The Examiner, then you've done the best you can do. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, doing the ones I can do.  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 21:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Done wire and by-lines.  Aaroncrick  ( talk )  Review me! 06:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)