Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery/archive1

Personal commentary
, in this 4 June post,  specifically asked that unhelpful personal commentary not be entered on FAR pages. In this 17 June post, you added unnecessary commentary, save for ad hominen attacks by Giano for "vandalism" and "anti-semitism." Please focus on content to avoid derailing FARs. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  05:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you claiming that such attacks were not, in fact, made? Or having been made, were redacted?   Ravenswing      06:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The issue is that commentary on this review should be focused only on whether the article meets the FA criteria and what improvements it may need. There are venues to deal with behavioural concerns and this is not one of them. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)