Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Space Race/archive1

Comments about the process moved here from the review subpage:
 * Comment—Alabamaboy, we can't possible use the FARC template on the Space Race talk page: it's misleading/incorrect now. Is there a new template for FA review nominations? I'll put a note on the talk page to drum up interest among the contributors. In terms of your Point (1) alone, a minor review might have been more appropriate. However, I can see that your other points make a major review suitable. Tony 14:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I totally agree. The problem is that the language on this FAR page said to use the FARC template. I just changed the FARC template language and link to reflect this new situation. The question remains, though, whether to rename the FARC template itself or keep it now that the wording and link in the template has been changed. One of the reasons I went ahead and made this nomination was to help figure out any flaws in the system. As a result I changed a number of links and wording on other pages so people will now come to FAR. Best,--Alabamaboy 14:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, I've found a major problem here and I can't fix it. On Template:FARC, the category link needs to be changed so that it links to FAR, not FARC. However, when I changed the link it didn't work. Anyone know how to fix this? Just to be clear, unless we fix this category link the link to FARC will remain at the top of each FAR nomination.--Alabamaboy 14:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * All problems with the FAR start-up appear to now be fixed.--Alabamaboy 15:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)