Wikipedia talk:Foldoc license

Shouldn't this page be protected? --Anon


 * Yeah, I guess so. Protected. --mav


 * It appears as if the "Edit this page" option could be removed on protected pages, such as the Foldoc license. /Wikiborg

FOLDOC is *not* a "public domain resource"

 * See also: Public domain resources

I don't see how that link relates to anything. What do public domain resources have to do with FOLDOC? FOLDOC is not a public domain work; it is restricted under United Kingdom copyright law and international treaties and licensed to the public under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. Shouldn't this notice be changed to point to GFDL resources, of which FOLDOC is one, instead of public-domain resources? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 15:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes. The 'see also' notice is obviously wrong.  It must be changed to point to "GNU Free Documentation License resources".  --Kanjy 10:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Fixed. Ral315 (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki link
Please remove all interwiki links. They are handled by Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graham 87 14:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)