Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident

Hello guys! I have never interacted with you two, unless my memory is failing me, so i really do not know if you are neutral enough to be mediators, but considering that it is an un-official mediation, i am going to agf in you and hope for the best. So lets begin. --Striver - talk 00:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I can guarentee you that I am neutral, I have never heard of this dispute until....well, now. I would like to explain how my case mediation works. For a week, both mediators will review the case and then ask all parties to sumbit statements. We will read them and then write down a resolution for all to consider. Wiki  e Zach|  talk  01:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds good for me. --Striver - talk 01:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please contact all parties that we have commenced mediation, please; Wiki  e Zach|  talk  01:56, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

First amendment
The First Amendment has nothing to do with this.

Wikipedia is not Congress; therefore, it is not bound by "Congress shall make no law..."

A private organization has every right to restrict content however it wishes on its property.

Sorry, but you fail it.