Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-10-08 Cell (Dragon Ball)

Let's begin
Okay, I've read the comments here, here, and here. I also read the first and second deletion discussions. When reviewing the merge discussion, there doesn't appear to have been a consensus for the merge (though it was close, and possibly leaning that way). However, there was not a clear consenus to merge, either, so it appears the article should have been left as it was (default to keep with no consensus, which is the general rule). Please post your comments here. Please keep them focused on the issue rather than other editors involved. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Pretty sure this issue is dying down now, but since a discussion here has started...


 * Firstly, I agree there wasn't any clear consensus for merge from the talk pages. Disregarding the first AfD for poor nomination, looking at the second AfD, to me there's quite a clear consensus with the merge. A lot of the arguments for keep did not address the reason the page was nominated, and the links provided have as yet not been verified to have anything regarding notability of the character.  The issue should definitely be addressed once again once verifiable notability is established.  However for now, I believe the second AfD correctly closed and the decision to merge was correct. That's what I believe, anyway. -- Highwind888, the Fuko Master (talk) 05:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Obviously it should have been left as it was, and one of us will restore the Cell page at some point in the future with more sources, because I don't believe the ruling was correct, and I believe sources clearly exist.JJJ999 (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)