Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-01/Clarence Thomas

Third party opinion
I recently stumbled upon the Clarence Thomas article, and was surprised to find this controversy happening, and the article locked up. I have added some comments to the article talk page, in an effort to provide a third opinion about the primary points of dispute.Ferrylodge (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)