Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-04/Kegel male trainer/Status

In truth, it would be a degradation of this invention,  which has classical underpinnings,  to be written up in the format of the Hitachi wand,  which is more in the domain of sex toys. My client would like the original post, with Vitruvian Man references,  and to have his invention treated with the dignity which is its due;  moreover,  to stop being falsely charged with sneaking in advertising. The latter exists in the eye of the beholder. Not in Mr. Dana's intention. I respectfully ask that this matter be cleared up, as I do intend to replace the full page. Kindly respond as soon as is convenient. With respect; Smkovalinsky (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Further Thoughts on Dispute Involving Kegel Male Trainer
My client and I are still awaiting mediation; if this dispute is not addressed in a timely fashion,  I will begin the process of placing his full post up once more,  seeing as no reasons for blocking of such have been furnished.

Moreover: '''It is clear that Mr. Dan's invention fulfills  the epitome of the Wikipedia criterion itself,  and meets all its standards:  The opposite of some covert advertising decoy which my client does not stand in need of  ( or comprising  a trivial sex toy like the Hitachi Magic Wand),  this invention is groundbreaking and stands in the mode of American invention genius. It has received a professorial commendation at a prominent university, and has had a ground-breaking patent format attending it. 15 irrefutable claims sit on its US Federal patent, as it is a highly ingenious invention,  and has classical underpinnings. '''

The patent process is a stringent and difficult one; few products attain one, and certainly not to the level of 15 irrefutable federal claims. I would hope this makes clear that Mr. Dana's product is more than worthy of a Wikipedia page. Anything less would seem to constitute discrimination. Smkovalinsky (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC) See link: Addendum: The Kegel Male Trainer holds not one but two US Patents: USPTO Patent No. 7,448,989 and 7,086,998,  both entitled "Male Exercise Devise". Smkovalinsky (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)