Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-06-30/Michael Tsarion

Who is to say a person is worthy of note or not? There are authors in wikipedia so why not Michael Tsarion. I am an engineer and have provided electricity and fresh water to 100s of 1000s of people. Shouldn't I have a page? I don't particularly want one but I think for one individual to censor the right of another individual is opinionated and should not be a part of the Wikipedia.

I'm not sure what I've just bumped into, but it strikes me as odd. I just had an interesting discussion with someone and he referenced Michael Tsarion as support for his argument. It was a name I'd never heard before, so I thought I'd Google him. There seemed to be a lot of sketchy material out there, but not much in the way of authoritative, or biographical information. I was especially hoping for a wikipedia article to cut through the crap for me, and was disappointed to find no such entry. I find wikipedia and excellent resource. I hope emotional people can be prevented from hijacking this valuable source of information too. I do not know the criteria for inclusion in wikipedia, but it seems odd to exclude someone who comes up 5th in the list of possible names when typing 'Michael T...' into a Google search. I come as someone with no agenda whatsoever, simply a surprise that my lack of information is not going to be satisfied by wikipedia, and that for some inexplicable reason, there probably will not be any in the near future. I rely on wikipedia for an attempt at objectivity, realizing the limitations. I was hoping that considering the obvious fact that Tsarion is a controversial figure, the existence of controversy alone would warrant mention. Whatever. 222.10.82.62 (talk) 14:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I can only concur with the viewpoint directly above me. It seems the emotional people in this instance are behind the wiki scenes, getting their non-NPOV way re his exclusion.


 * Me too! I am very surprised to find no article for Michael Tsarion. I've just been watching his presentation on YouTube, and cane to Wikipedia for comprehensive information on him. The man seems to be influential to alternative historians, and the same league as David Icke. Leighblackall (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * ❤I also concur, sir!❤ 97.121.164.222 (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Me too! I have also noticed Harald Kautz-Vella doesn’t get a wiki page….. 101.174.134.175 (talk) 08:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)