Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-08-11/Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

An Update on the Status of the Issues...
Hi Gigs! Thanks for your willingness to take on this mediation. I received your message, and I also apologize for not getting back to you sooner. You should know that there have been a couple of behind the scenes activities since this mediation was brought to the cabal.

In terms of my issues with B'ham35242's discussion style, it should be noted that we had a good discussion on my talk page, and he has apologized for any trouble that he has caused on the SeaTac Airport website. Consequently, we are now on very good terms, and he understands that a) he should not create new aliases every time he has a heated discussion with another editor, b) that no editor is intentionally trying to attack others, and c) that he should contact me or another trusted editor if he feels that someone is attacking him. He is currently not using the alias mentioned above, rather, he is now editing under an IP address for now. I believe this issue to be closed for now.

In terms of the direct/nonstop issue, there has been an ongoing discussion started on the WP:AIRPORTS discussion page, regarding whether or not direct destinations are eligible to be listed. Currently the options on the table are to either a) keep direct destinations, except to distinguish them from true nonstop destinations, a footnote would be included or b) change the protocol/guidelines regarding the listing of direct flights entirely... if you could contribute a third-party opinion to this discussion, it would be great.

For future reference, to find the guideline in debate, go to WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT and scroll down to "Body", specifically clause #6.

Thanks! Wickedlyperfect18 (talk) 07:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have commented on the (transcluded) talk page for WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. Gigs (talk) 02:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)