Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-12-08/Global Warming

Not acceptable as framed
The case has been framed in a very slanted way. The notion that it isn't a scientific article is unacceptable. The notion that the hacking of the Climatic Research Unit and subsequent controversy has any place in the article is unacceptable. The question of whether "questionable reversion tactics [are] being used to create an atmosphere of intimidation on those who express legitimate concerns of the article" can be resolved by a request for enforcement at General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement. --TS 21:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Waste of time
It has become clear this is a waste of time. To add insult to injury the mediator is now off on holiday. I'm unwatching here; in the very unlikely event I need to be contacted about this case (please *don't* bother notify me when it meets its inevitable untimely demise) use my talk page William M. Connolley (talk) 20:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)