Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/20 August 2011/Non-lethal weapon

=¿Why Is It Still There?= At this point it has been agreed that AI is biased; ¿Why has the offending text not been removed? (At this point it remains a question; I am asking in the assumption that there is a reason, and I simply do not know what it is, perhaps legal, perhaps technical, perhaps that no one knows exactly how to proceed yet.) A REDDSON

=Rules Of Mediation Question= ¿Are parties in a mediation matter allowed to discuss the matter before signing the agreement to enter mediation? Specifically, Alexandr Dmitri and Marcus Qwertyus have stated they have no intrest in this matter, fine and good for them (one of them offered a solution, but otherwise has stayed out), but ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► and Binksternet are defending their positions without even signing the agreement section (it caught my eye because I am the ONLY one to sign the section in question). A REDDSON
 * MedCab is very informal. If a mediator picks a case, it gets mediated. (edit: I guess what I should say is that it's up to the mediator whether the acceptance list is important.) Xavexgoem (talk) 05:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It seems to me at least one person is desperately trying to get this matter closed before it’s heard, so when I noticed he’d not even signed the acceptance section, it got me curios. If the mediator (TransporterMan seesm to be taking it, if I read his comments correctly) doesn’t care if they sign or not, well that doesn’t bother me. It gets mediated, period. That’s good enough. A REDDSON