Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:CheFEM App

The internet sources on the software are limited (but definitely not solely producer) because it is specialist software. The software is used by reputable research and commercial organizations around the globe. Furthermore, I have had the repeatable impression that the given references were rigorously checked; for example: in the first reference the use and added value of CheFEM is described thoroughly and independently in a research context. The second reference, is on an a session organized by Stanford University.

In my opinion the "advert card" has been played too easily by the editors, maybe because the contents is not their direct field of expertise.

Please advice, as I do not agree on the deletion.

Hey there, I moved your comment over to the voting page, which is typically where discussion takes place for this board. If you would like to vote keep (I presume you do), just change it from Comment to Keep. Thanks!  Kees08  (Talk)   23:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)