Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Thomas W.P. Slatin

Draft:Thomas_W.P._Slatin Requesting assistance to resolve this matter. There are MORE THAN ENOUGH independent sources and media available, which is to be expected due to this persons 20+ year career. It seems as if no matter how many sources are added, the community still decides that it is not enough, or that the verifiable sources, of which Wikipedia has in past cases, deemed verifiable, are not significant enough. This has turned a very legitimate article submission into one of constant harassment and unfairness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:120a:4fc:f8c6:3ab1:f8e4:fa0a (talk) 19:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Make your argument in the discussion by identifying criteria from NARTIST and GNG that establish notability based on identified, specific notability references.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Look at what they did to the MfD, calling my nomination harrassment Legacypac (talk) 20:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)