Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Ed Poor subpages

More Ed Poor subpages that possibly should be considered for deletion
Given the large number of subpages, I thought I'd run a number of the candidates here, before formally submitting them:
 * 2 1/2 yo code fragments for a depreciated template:
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 0
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 1
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 2
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 3
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 4
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 5
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 6
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 7
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 8
 * User:Ed Poor/+ 9
 * User:Ed Poor/minus1
 * User:Ed Poor/minus10
 * User:Ed Poor/minus11
 * User:Ed Poor/minus12
 * User:Ed Poor/minus13
 * User:Ed Poor/minus14
 * User:Ed Poor/minus15
 * User:Ed Poor/minus2
 * User:Ed Poor/minus3
 * User:Ed Poor/minus4
 * User:Ed Poor/minus5
 * User:Ed Poor/minus6
 * User:Ed Poor/minus7
 * User:Ed Poor/minus8
 * User:Ed Poor/minus9
 * [Nominated as Miscellany for deletion/Ed Poor + or minus pages HrafnTalkStalk 15:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC) ]
 * 2 yo difs of Intelligent designer:
 * User:Ed Poor/001
 * User:Ed Poor/002
 * 2 1/2 yo code fragments:
 * User:Ed Poor/2digit
 * User:Ed Poor/Before
 * User:Ed Poor/Current time
 * User:Ed Poor/before
 * User:Ed Poor/before 1
 * User:Ed Poor/before 2
 * User:Ed Poor/before 5
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar0
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar1
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar2
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar3
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar4
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar5
 * User:Ed Poor/calendar6


 * 3 yo code fragments:
 * User:Ed Poor/foo1
 * User:Ed Poor/foo2
 * User:Ed Poor/foo3
 * User:Ed Poor/foo4
 * User:Ed Poor/foo5
 * User:Ed Poor/foo6
 * User:Ed Poor/foo7
 * User:Ed Poor/foo8
 * User:Ed Poor/foo9


 * 3 yo 'thoughts':
 * User:Ed Poor/thought
 * User:Ed Poor/thought0
 * User:Ed Poor/thought1
 * User:Ed Poor/thought10
 * User:Ed Poor/thought11
 * User:Ed Poor/thought12
 * User:Ed Poor/thought13
 * User:Ed Poor/thought14
 * User:Ed Poor/thought15
 * User:Ed Poor/thought16
 * User:Ed Poor/thought17
 * User:Ed Poor/thought18
 * User:Ed Poor/thought19
 * User:Ed Poor/thought2
 * User:Ed Poor/thought20
 * User:Ed Poor/thought21
 * User:Ed Poor/thought22
 * User:Ed Poor/thought23
 * User:Ed Poor/thought24
 * User:Ed Poor/thought25
 * User:Ed Poor/thought26
 * User:Ed Poor/thought27
 * User:Ed Poor/thought28
 * User:Ed Poor/thought29
 * User:Ed Poor/thought3
 * User:Ed Poor/thought30
 * User:Ed Poor/thought31
 * User:Ed Poor/thought4
 * User:Ed Poor/thought5
 * User:Ed Poor/thought6
 * User:Ed Poor/thought7
 * User:Ed Poor/thought8
 * User:Ed Poor/thought9


 * Numerous 2yo mottos:
 * User:Ed Poor/motto06
 * User:Ed Poor/motto10
 * User:Ed Poor/motto11
 * User:Ed Poor/motto12
 * User:Ed Poor/motto13
 * User:Ed Poor/motto14
 * User:Ed Poor/motto15
 * User:Ed Poor/motto16
 * User:Ed Poor/motto17
 * User:Ed Poor/motto22
 * User:Ed Poor/motto23


 * Miscellaneous 1 yo code fragments:
 * User:Ed Poor/AMPM
 * User:Ed Poor/Days ago
 * Miscellaneous 2 yo text fragments:
 * User:Ed Poor/Added
 * Miscellaneous 2 1/2 yo redirects:
 * User:Ed Poor/Age
 * Miscellaneous 1 1/2 yo links to difs:
 * User:Ed Poor/Bias
 * 6yo stub of what appears to have once been an attack-page:
 * User:Ed Poor/Dr. Kemp
 * 4yo page of "books I've finished lately":
 * User:Ed Poor/Books

... and a whole heap of other stuff (mostly code fragments I think), that I couldn't be bothered dating/identifying. HrafnTalkStalk 04:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Given how all of those are just fragments and personal thoughts, I wonder if a heaping helping of WP:IAR might apply to deleting this bundle. &mdash;  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 05:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:WEBHOST would appear to apply, given the vast amount of material. I don't think that WP:IAR is needed. HrafnTalkStalk 06:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreement from moi. Ironholds (talk) 07:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - wikipedia is not a webhost for anything, much less for screeds against the real world. // roux    10:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ummm, as I stated above, this list has not, as yet, been formally submitted -- this is only a talk page after all. HrafnTalkStalk 11:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Just putting my opinion out there. You have large doses of clue; I doubt you would nom naything in bad faith. I looked at a few links randomly; all of it should go. // roux    11:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I think we should leave out value judgments on the validity of EP's opinions. There are plenty of other reasons to delete, and there's no sense in bringing potential accusations of censorship into this. -kotra (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree entirely. I've tried to focus this MfD on the content and the policies this content violates, not the opinions, behaviour or longevity of the user involved, which are all irrelevant to our decision. Tim Vickers (talk) 02:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The content is, by and large, POV forks that have only the most passing relationship with reality. Wikipedia is not a webhost for such things. // roux    03:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As I understand WP:NPOV, it's about "articles and other encyclopedic content". Userfied content need not conform to a NPOV, since it's not in the article space (userboxen often being a great example of POV in the user space). These subpages do fail WP:WEBHOST, but that policy is different. -kotra (talk) 05:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Housecleaning
That's the lot. I'm keeping two of them. Thanks, Philippe!