Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Gadget-NewMainPage

If there is a problem with the close, talk to the closer, and if that fails go to WP:DRV. If there is a good IAR reason, explain in the edit summary. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn't WP:INVOLVED a good enough IAR reason? There was discussion with the closer at User talk:CFCF, forcing people to start a DRV to undo this seems like a poor application of burocracy. Fram (talk) 07:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually the close is incorrect on two levels - first by an involved party who has an interest in keeping it closed, secondly the rationale for the close is incorrect. MFD clearly states Mediawiki and Gadgets are handled here. So closing procedurally on 'its handled elsewhere' is also incorrect. Only in death does duty end (talk) 07:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)