Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy/Arguments (2nd nomination)

Archive?
According to my count, the result of the poll was keep. Only five voters mentioned archiving &mdash; one less than the number who voted to delete. Now, there may be no difference in this case, but I hope it does not transpire that the "archive" vote is used to make this information harder to find. &#0151; JEREMY 04:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The page was marked as an archive, informing people not to edit the page any more. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 14:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I basically closed it as a keep, but with the added addition of Archiving the page at the suggestion of several other editors. I believe their wish was that the page be kept for historical reasons, but that further discussion to the page be discouraged. That is why I added the Archive top template to the page, to discourage further discussion on that page. The page should not be any harder to find, since it is located exactly where it always has been, and nothing was changed to any of the incoming links to it. The only difference is the Archival tags added to it. I hope that clarifies it for you. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 21:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It does; thanks. &#0151; JEREMY 01:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)