Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Conorrickard/Cyanovirin-N

unban
Hi All,

I did not realize how attentive to my activity the wiki community would be. I did not use the sandbox on my first try either. I was in the middle of editing Cyanovirin-N and saving occasionally for electronic assurance to myself. I was not done with the references at all.

The original post I had completely deleted already. I apologize if this seems rash or is not conventional educate. I did have a couple choice statements with references from the original post I was peppering into mine. To be transparent, I did not really care to look into the references of the original post.

The original post had (1) scientific info and (2) gossip about a couple scientists. Even if the gossip or opinions of the scientists were cited, again, to be be transparent, I felt this was close to useless information. I researched the origin, structure, and mechanisms against viruses via published articles, and I found my scientific explanation to be just as good or better than the original post. If redundant, mine was well organized and cited.

This is an assignment for a biochemistry class. And we are trying to help with stubs. While this is not exactly "expanding" but more of a complete revision, I do not feel (A) my post was fallacious nor (2) I now deserve to be banned from editing any post until October.

I can't even get into my sandbox now, where I was directed to go. I have not intentionally done anything untoward. and I followed suggestions. Please allow me to help you and my biochemistry class by sharing this science with the public for free.

Sincerely,

Conor

Conorrickard (talk) 23:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Conor has made this same query at his user talk page. I have responded there. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)