Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ohconfucius/WikiDiva Awards

Do not delete, no need to suppress a bad project idea, but blank, or blank and protect if subsequently necessary so as to clearly inform that this page is not OK. As humour, it is humour in bad taste. We have WP:TROUT and WP:STOCKS, but we don't want too many of these things. This one is too provovative. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure I understand why blanking and protecting is better than deleting? If it were simply blanked the offensive material would still be accessible in the history. –xeno (talk) 12:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I thought, keep the material available, out of principle, because the page is a policy idea. I was not aware of any offensive material in the history.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)