Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:William M. Connolley/For me/Misc arbcomm-y stuff

Discussion moved from project page
re; *Delete per UP#NOT (bullet 10). I suggest that this is not the "reaction" to the desysopping, or even particularly the process that lead to it, but a considered airing of a grievance. Unless it is intended to form the basis of a process - although I cannot think of one, apart from an appeal to Jimbo - then there is no basis for it to remain upon Wikipedia space. I should comment that this is the same basis under which I filed a MfD on a page devoted to the "problems" of another admin. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The obvious process is for referral for people who cannot remember which Arbcom members disgraced themselves next time there are Arbcom elections. In the end the whole thing is our fault. If we weren't apathetic the current Arbcom members would not have made the current decisions.--BozMo talk 15:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I have responded on the talkpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 18:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * At the time there would be reason to link to the sentiments expressed here, whether it is an off Wiki link or this text reproduced on Wiki pages as part of the ArbCom election process. In the meantime, it serves only to sour perceptions upon both sides of the grievance - according to sympathy/perception. LessHeard vanU (talk) 18:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)