Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Valued pictures


 * These are not valid to what I was looking for. You seem to have pulled random noms that involve mentioning of VPC. As you can see, many of these images are very poor in quality but high EV, which brings us back to why VP exists. If you can't pull out any evidence of shunting, then it can't be claimed as dangerous to FP.  Zoo Fari  01:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually I specifically culled the ones that merely mentioned VP randomly. The list would be considerably longer if I had done as you assert.  Although it remains possible that a small number might have been screened better.  Bear in mind, several FP regulars were accusing me of falsehood and demanding prompt response.  "Fast, cheap, or good: pick any two" as they say in business.  My labor is volunteered, so you toggle the two remaining options.  Submitted in good faith.  Durova Charge! 01:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)