Wikipedia talk:NOTGUINNESS

Namechange for standardization
Well, I did not actually expect this to be made! I must say, thanks for noticing that! However, could I ask that this is renamed / deleted? In my experience with policy redirects, a title such as WP:NGUINNESS can be misleading, as the "N" usually implies notability. The redirect that I should have used in the AFD for this purpose would be WP:NOTGUINNESS, where it is clear that Wikipedia is NOT for listing record holders. WP:NGUINNESS would seem to be and article for the notability of record holders, and that is not what we are trying to have.

In addition, there should probably be a distinct policy subsection that WP:NOTGUINNESS would go to, and the closest target that is present that could potentially fit this would be WP:NOTNEWS. So, if this would even exist, I (or somebody else) should draft a subsection to include in WP:NOT before a NOTGUINNESS redirect should exist.

Regardless, I'm glad that you listened to my suggestion, but I believe my suggestion itself was a bit hasty for actual inclusion. In the meantime, if you could move the page WP:NGUINNESS to WP:NOTGUINNESS, that would be fantastic. Usually, I would put this up at WP:RM. However, I wanted to talk you through what I was thinking here as you were the one who took my suggestion. (If I could, I'd move it right now, but I'm not yet qualified for the Page Mover right.) Anyway, cheers! Utopes (talk) 01:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , I think you are right. NOTGUINNESS is the better name. As for the right policy section, it goers with many others as #Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I'll do that.  (As a general way of working here, it's often best to just do something needed, and refine it later ). DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)