Wikipedia talk:No confidence

This is a proposal that has not yet gained community consensus, and should thus be tagged as such. Until it becomes widely accepted as policy or as part of Wikipedia's dispute resolution mechanism, it should be tagged as such to identify it as a proposal rather than an accepted part of our processes. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 22:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * This proposal was created by a sockpuppet of banned user . See . Since all edits by a banned user may be reverted by any other user, I recommend deleting this trolling disguised as a "proposal". Carbonite | Talk 23:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Get rid of it. David | Talk 23:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Concur. Shall I delete it? Flcelloguy (A note? ) 23:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Please do. Thanks. Carbonite | Talk


 * Done. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 23:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

While the initiating user may have been banned, I have to say that this isn't a half-bad idea, given some of the more questionable administrator actions I've seen of late. Rogue 9 03:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * So create an RFC already and cite clear evidence rather than unsubstantiated allegations. FUD doesn't cut it. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 19:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)