Wikipedia talk:Ownership of content

Statements
Am i allowed to add extra examples in the statements section? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * For policy pages like this, it is best to propose changes and get consensus for them first. Most substantive changes to policy pages are reverted.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  20:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

"Ownership of articles" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ownership_of_articles&redirect=no Ownership of articles] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Positive implications
This page mainly talks about the negative sides of now owning content namely that authors and subjects can't control the content etc but I think we should also talk about the positive sides namely the lack of responsibility due to now owning content. Namely for example that the author of an article doesn't generally have an ongoing duty to watch the page for vandalism, updates or a need to change the content due to a change in consensus that occurred after the article was created as long as the content was acceptable at the time the article was created, see WP:MESS. Also that subjects do not have a responsibility to maintain the article for policy violations, inaccuracies or vandalism.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 19:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I've added this as there has been no objects in a few weeks though maybe it could be improved.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

"Routine adminstration" with Linter
Hi, I started a discussion at WP:Helpdesk about whether user pages are somehow different from other pages, even sacrosanct? I ended up WP:OWN#User pages, which says "Usually others will not edit your primary user page, other than to address significant concerns (rarely); or to do routine housekeeping, such as handling project-related tags, disambiguating links to pages that have been moved, removing the page from categories meant for articles, replacing non-free content by linking to it, or removing obvious vandalism or BLP violations."" The concise answer from Wikipedia talk:Linter was Could this perhaps be clearly stated in the 'Background' section in the Project page, and elsewhere?  MinorProphet (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)