Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Tikal the Echidna/archive1

Tikal the Echidna
This article is quite stable (except for one time) and has references, notes, and sources. It has pictures, and it has enough information about the subject. Is there anything else wrong with this article? I feel like something might be unencylopedic around the Fleetway and Archie section, though, but I'm not sure. So is there anything wrong with it? --71.104.187.145 20:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)