Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/987li

Rsrikanth05's Neutral vote
-- Split from here --
 * 1) I like your edits. I really do. It's just that there a re so few of them! Make a few more edits, [by few I mean a lot], and then come back. You're sure to get everyone's votes. Till then, I don't think you'd succeed. Cheers, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Edits don't actually matter. Sir Nick became an admin with 3000 edits. It is the quality of edits, experince and good understanding of policies that speaks. Your neutral vote gives a comperatively less experinced editor a view that only edits are important.  Yash  t  101   10:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The point of my vote being neutral is lost now. It is known that edit count does not matter. I DID NOT mean that edit count matters, I merely stated that a little more edits [which implies more experience] is required. If it were indeed about edit count, it would be in the oppose section right? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Then you should state it in your vote because this editor is relatively unexperinced and also little impulsive who doesn't understand exactly how RfA works. So, if you don't eloberate your concern, then the editor can be mistaken and may go on wrong track caring only about edits.  Yash  t  101   10:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 *  It's just that there a re so few of them! Make a few more edits, [by few I mean a lot], and then come back. You're sure to get everyone's votes. Till then, I don't think you'd succeed. 
 * By this statement, even an experinced editor would think that your concern is only about edits. Thanks.  Yash  t  101   10:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you are so concerned about what I say. Can we please take this to my TALK PAGE? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I had to look. To be fair, Sir Nick's RfA was six years ago. Dru of Id (talk) 11:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * @Dru of Id: Yes, many things have changed since sir nick, but a editor who had 24K edits didn't succeed in his RfA and an editor with 10K+ edits succeed. This all happened in this month, so my point was that edits don't matter much. Yes, there should be more edits, but experince and understanding are the key factors which Rsrikanth ignored and made statement which showed that his concern was only with edit counts. Though he clarified little later onwards.
 * @Srikanth: Please see this: SHOUT
 * I am not particularly concerned with you or your comments, in fact, this is the first time when I m opposing your work. The vote that you made was not at all proper. It could mislead any unexperinced editor to think that edits are the greatest things that matters which we don't want to happen.  Yash  t  101   11:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey Yasht101, I'm sure you have not understood what Rsrikanth05 is intending to explain you. I agree to the fact that edit count doesn't matter, but it does too. Edit count more than 8,000 is just a minor contribution, but it does helps the editor [user] to understand the guidelines of Wikipedia. A mere 600 edits is not enough to be an admin as the admin related changes affect the whole website. The editor himself has admitted that he intents to work mainly towards episode guides and new articles on the episodes listed in the episode guide, then why adminship? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I did understand Srikanth's point. But the editor who is running for adminship, I don't think will understand the point that we see.
 * Comments like this:  Make a few more edits, [by few I mean a lot], and then come back. You're sure to get everyone's votes will only encourage editor to increase edit count.  Yash  t  101   12:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I m not against Srikanth, indeed he is a great editor and one of my very best friends on wiki. My concern was with his voting statement which he made. He later clarified that also, but if I hadn't commented, someone else would have. And if no one did, it could send a wrong message to the editor.  Yash  t  101   12:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yasht101. At RFA, people are expected to express THEIR OWN opinions - not the ones you want them to express. I recommend you let this drop now and stop badgering people please. Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I m not against his vote, nor I m badgering people. I m just saying what I feel because his vote might confuse any new editor.  Yash  t  101   13:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I really don't know how to react. Is there any rules to refrain new editors who act as experienced enough to mind in every business. Can I have an admin saying User:Yasht101 the purpose of being here. Yash don't you think we have enough experienced editors to take care of such things. And please when an admin says something, note and follow. I see above you don't even accept your faults *sigh* -- ɑηsuмaη  ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 14:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)