Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Agüeybaná

Edits
Per wannabe_kate Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 02:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC) User:Agüeybaná

run at Sun Oct 7 02:41:15 2007 GMT

Category:	10 Image talk:	1 Image:	62 Mainspace	1788 Portal talk:	2 Portal:	42 Talk:	434 Template talk:	27 Template:	49 User talk:	2813 User:	458 Wikipedia talk:	84 Wikipedia:	2085 avg edits per page	2.13 earliest	19:35, 10 March 2007 number of unique pages	3695 total	7855 2007/3 	34 	2007/4 	547 	2007/5 	834 	2007/6 	1207 	2007/7 	1714 	2007/8 	1782 	2007/9 	1433 	2007/10 	304

Mainspace 48	Puerto Rico 37	Ed Trice 23	List of 50 Cent awards and nominations 22	Ramón Emeterio Betances 21	Luis Muñoz Marín 18	Brian Sidney Bembridge 18	List of U2 awards 14	Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional (Puerto Rico) 13	Glory Annen Clibbery 12	65th Infantry Regiment (United States) 12	Mariana Bracetti 12	Miranda Cosgrove 12	Kiel McClung 11	DJA FM 11	Mercy (1995 film) Talk: 45	Main Page 22	Puerto Rico 10	Ed Trice 7	Wicked Priest 7	Ramón Emeterio Betances 7	Roberto Clemente 6	Feeder 6	Larry Mullen Jr. 5	Gothic Chess 5	Jay Barbree 5	Benoyendranath Sen 5	Tomb of Antipope John XXIII 4	Alexis Y Fido 4	Glory Annen Clibbery 4	Agüeybaná and Agüeybaná II Category: 2	Student radio stations in South Africa 2	B-Class AFC articles Image: 4	Mercy 2000 DVD cover.jpg 4	Logo Colegio San Ignacio.gif 3	Munozmar.gif 3	Sanglyph.jpg 2	El Principe de la Niebla.jpg 2	Hairspray Poster.gif 2	The Giver Cover.gif 2	Bobby Z Poster.jpg 2	Cool Blue poster.GIF 2	Lincoln motion picture.jpg 2	Screenshot AFC Script 2.PNG 2	Luis Muñoz Marín.jpg 2	FALN logo.JPG 2	Northsquare.jpg 2	Mercy 1995 DVD.jpg Portal: 18	Puerto Rico/News 12	Puerto Rico/News/Archive 2	Puerto Rico/Nominations 2	Puerto Rico/Selected pictures Portal talk: 2	Puerto Rico Template: 10	Vandalism information 5	Afc inuse 4	GA number 4	Botlinks2 2	California Victory squad 2	Botlinks2/doc 2	Quotation 2	Infobox Bot 2	Afc exists Template talk: 25	Did you know User: 107	Agüeybaná 39	Agüeybaná/Creations 27	Agüeybaná/monobook.js 20	Agüeybaná/Talkpage header 20	Agüeybaná/MainUserpage 19	Agüeybaná/Awards 16	Agüeybaná/Test 13	R/EFD 10	Agüeybaná/VandalWarning1 7	Smaug123/Adoption 7	EddieBot 6	Agüeybaná/DYK 6	Agüeybaná/Puerto Rico 6	BoricuaBot 5	AlexNewArtBot/GoodSearchResult User talk: 114	Agüeybaná 62	Caribbean H.Q. 58	Husond 55	ArielGold 47	Politics rule 45	Phaedriel 42	Dihydrogen Monoxide 40	Marine 69-71 33	R 32	The Random Editor 30	Neranei 27	Pasajero 22	Mtmelendez 21	Runewiki777 18	Kappa Wikipedia: 194	Usernames for administrator attention 81	Sandbox 51	Help desk 34	Requests for adminship/Boricuaeddie 34	Articles for creation/2007-08-02 29	Articles for creation/2007-07-27 29	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 29	Articles for creation/2007-06-27 28	Articles for creation/2007-06-25 27	Administrator intervention against vandalism 24	Requests for adminship/Caribbean H.Q. 23	Motto of the day/Nominations/In review 19	Articles for creation/2007-06-28 18	Articles for creation/2007-08-14 18	Articles for creation/2007-08-03 Wikipedia talk: 21	Requests for adminship 12	Wikipedia is a community 5	AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage 4	WikiProject Puerto Rico 3	Citing sources 3	Bots/Approvals group 3	Usernames for administrator attention 3	WikiProject Articles for creation 3	Requests for adminship/Boricuaeddie 3	Articles for deletion 2	Wikipedia Signpost/2007-09-03/From the editor 2	Requests for checkuser/Case/Qst 2	Deletion process 2	Requests for adminship/Hersfold 2

Oh noes
Oh noes... I sense another YOU GOT TOO MANY NOMS SO GO AWAY -- Hirohisat 紅葉 07:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not really? I didn't even oppose... obviously, as an anon. It's not a poor reflection on Eddie, just a reflection on the poor judgement of the people who added the third/fourth/fifth/sixth noms. I see this is another MISCHARACTERISE OTHER PEOPLE'S COMMENTS SO THAT YOU CAN FEEL FREE TO IGNORE THEM. 86.137.25.192 18:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Why don't you log back in, and participate? :) SQL(Query Me!) 19:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd say something about AGF but I get the feeling it'd be lost on you. Never had an account, 'fyi', online communities don't interest me. But I am interested in how Wikipedia works as it is a top ten website and the most frequent reference for information for people with internet access. It's a bit sad that 'Wikipedians' can't cope with the idea of 'anonymous' editing, even though they allow it and it is apparently an OK thing to do. It's not as if you need to be a frequent contributor to get an idea of how Wikipedia works, I browse RFA, ANI and RFARB ocassionally just to see how things are panning out in wiki-land. Your attitude (and the other attitudes expressed here) is exactly why I don't bother registering on online 'communities' - people are really rude for no real reason. And I love that the big issue here is that I'm 'anonymous' and not how retarded it is to add the sixth nomination to an RFA (or to copy and paste a nomination from months ago, for that matter).


 * P.S. The whole 'no previous contribs' thing is a bit of a non sequitur as my IP is dynamic. 86.137.25.192 19:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Co-noms
This RfA originally included 6 co-noms, as seen here. I notified the users, of course, when I removed them, as suggested in the discussion section of this RfA. This is just for anyone who's curious :-) -- Ag ü  eybaná  15:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) However, I see that you didn't notify Politics Rule? Correct me if I'm wrong. 86.137.25.192 18:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Pat is no longer actively with us. Anyway, he did not nominate me himself; it was copied and pasted from by last RfA by Hirohisat. I feel as if it is not necessary to notify him. I will, of course, do it, if you, or anyone else, request it :-) -- Ag ü  eybaná  19:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh right. How strange... never mind ;) 86.137.25.192 19:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Question 5
Eddie, I'm just curious to know what your thought-process is behind removing admin tools from admins who don't use them for five months? I could conjecture, but I'm more interested in what you have to say about it. Also, what do you think about RfA candidates who don't nominate themselves for adminship, but accept and are unlikely to use the tools? Are they power-hungry too? Into The Fray T /C  19:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The policy regarding removal of sysop rights because of inactivity can be found at commons:Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. Anything you want and don't want to know about that can be found there. What do I think about it? Nothing; I just entirely agree with it. Regarding your second question, yes, the same principles apply. -- Ag ü  eybaná  20:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Am I wrong or does your response seem a little ... terse? I fully admit I could be.  If you thought my question was argumentative, I apologize; I was really just looking for your thought process, not a debate.  I read the policy and the corresponding talk page.  Thanks.  Into The Fray  T /C  21:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)