Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Alison

Alison's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 19:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC):

 Go back to see caveats or to check another user.

User:Alison

run at Wed Mar 14 08:12:30 2007 GMT

Category talk:	28 Category:	54 Image talk:	18 Image:	95 Mainspace	3677 Portal:	4 Talk:	548 Template talk:	14 Template:	108 User talk:	1528 User:	476 Wikipedia talk:	70 Wikipedia:	474 avg edits per article	2.46 earliest	20:38, 16 February 2004 number of unique pages	2887 total	7094 2004/2 	5 	2004/3 	0 	2004/4 	0 	2004/5 	6 	2004/6 	0 	2004/7 	3 	2004/8 	0 	2004/9 	0 	2004/10 	4 	2004/11 	74 	2004/12 	47 	2005/1 	24 	2005/2 	15 	2005/3 	15 	2005/4 	90 	2005/5 	147 	2005/6 	128 	2005/7 	224 	2005/8 	269 	2005/9 	186 	2005/10 	92 	2005/11 	106 	2005/12 	123 	2006/1 	75 	2006/2 	92 	2006/3 	127 	2006/4 	389 	2006/5 	473 	2006/6 	286 	2006/7 	56 	2006/8 	72 	2006/9 	177 	2006/10 	258 	2006/11 	234 	2006/12 	925 	2007/1 	740 	2007/2 	731 	2007/3 	901

Mainspace 88	Transsexualism 69	Ireland 49	Scanger 43	Tuberculosis 34	Steve Stanton 34	Penis removal 30	Shemale 29	Saint Patrick 28	Plastic surgery 28	Patrick Augustine Sheehan 26	Charles Haughey 26	Buttevant 25	Fermoy 25	Plastic Paddy 24	Michael Cusack Talk: 30	Transsexualism 17	Strabane 17	Cork (city) 16	Plastic Paddy 14	Scanger 13	Ireland 10	Steve Stanton 8	Irish-Scots 7	Shemale 7	Toby Meltzer 7	Buttevant 6	Saint Patrick 6	Pre-Code 6	Éamon de Valera 5	Burning Man Category talk: 2	Health in Belgium 2	Hospitals in Belgium 2	Healthcare in Belgium Category: 4	User fth-2 3	Food companies of Ireland 2	Hospitals in Belgium 2	Belgian surgeons 2	Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Limerick 2	Healthcare in Belgium 2	Pages needing expert attention from Pharmacology experts 2	WikiProject Pharmacology members 2	Wikipedians by alma mater: National University of Ireland, Galway 2	County Wicklow 2	Translation Request/ga 2	Wikipedians by alma mater: Institute of Technology, Carlow 2	User ga-3 Image: 4	Arm IPL.jpg 4	Juggler.jpg 4	Neonman2.jpg 3	Senatornorris.jpg 3	Gb ken.jpg 3	Raising cross.jpg 3	Muirchu.jpg 3	Steve Stanton.jpg 3	Johnireland.jpg 3	RnaG.gif 3	Pookie.jpg 3	Sylvesters well.jpg 2	RTE1.gif 2	Ken Musgrave.jpg 2	ArtsCouncilIreland.gif Image talk: 2	Naval Jack of Ireland.svg 2	Bitchstar.JPG 2	AllisonFisher.jpg 2	Jeanie Johnston i.jpg Template: 9	WikiProject Irish Maritime 6	Irish maritime-stub 6	Sex hormones 6	Electricity generation in Ireland 5	User WikiProject Pharmacology 5	User ga-3 4	User WPMed 3	User en-Ire-N 3	User WPBelgium 3	User wikiga 3	User WPIrish Maritime 3	Garda Síochána 2	IrishNavyFleet 2	User Kansas City 2	WikiPortal Ireland Template talk: 3	Celtic mythology 3	Userpage 2	CUSD User: 177	Alison 35	Alison/Userboxes 33	Alison/Images 31	Alison/sandbox 28	Alison/to do 14	Alison/Status 9	ClemMcGann/maritime 7	Alison/Articles 7	Anyaanomaly 6	Alison/Awards 5	Alison/Bar 5	Alison/todobox 5	Alison/monobook.js 5	Acalamari/Been semi-protected 5	Alison/Userboxes/User WikiChix User talk: 283	Alison 50	Demiurge 15	85.43.58.100 14	Fvasconcellos 13	Kathryn NicDhàna 12	Ryanpostlethwaite 12	Alison/Archive 1 11	DianePa 11	Abtract 10	Djegan 10	Fergananim 9	Anyaanomaly 8	81.158.182.196 7	Jkelly 7	Acalamari Wikipedia: 70	Requests for comment/User names 52	Irish Wikipedians' notice board 38	Administrator intervention against vandalism 27	Requests for adminship/Ryanpostlethwaite 23	Irish Wikipedians' notice board/to do 18	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 16	Requests for page protection 15	WikiProject Irish Maritime 10	Editor review/Alison 8	Articles for deletion/Toby Meltzer 8	WikiProject Irish Maritime/to do 7	Articles for deletion/Brian Reddy 7	Changing username/Usurpations 6	Requests for adminship/Seraphimblade 2 5	Requests for comment/Rms125a@hotmail.com Wikipedia talk: 19	Irish Wikipedians' notice board 7	WikiProject Irish Maritime 6	WikiProject Pharmacology 6	Changing username/Usurpations 5	WikiProject Drugs 4	WikiProject LGBT studies 4	Administrator intervention against vandalism 4	Requests for comment/User names 4	Username policy 3	Requests for adminship/Ryanpostlethwaite 3	WikiProject Ireland 3	Signatures

If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot. Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2]



Why am i disallowed to oppose?
Strangely, i've opposed and my opposition was removed. Can someone please expain? J O R D A N [ talk ] 12:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You opposed before the Rfa had started so it was removed, she must have accepted the nom before anyone can comment Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 13:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * What Ryan said. Here's where an admin deleted it. I'd put it back in myself but daren't as that would not be appropriate :) Suggest you go ahead and try again now since it's up and running. - Alison ☺ 20:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've decided to be bold and re-added J O R D A N's oppose vote. Will also note this on the user's talk page. -- MarcoTolo 00:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * They should also be asked why they oppose. Ryan and I are questioning the user's decision. It's not because we're biased; it's because we're not sure about the answer this user gave. Acalamari 02:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure there was a need for both noms to ask the same question- which looks a bit like ganging up. Ryan asked the question perfectly clearly, I don't think it needed a seconder... WjBscribe 05:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with WJB. Opposers don't have to explain themselves anymore than supporters do. Of course, it helps the candidate look for potential areas to improve if opposers explain their rationale but they don't have to and shouldn't be interrogated about it. Sarah 10:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree with sarah and WJB, I simply asked the question because I felt it was a misunderstanding, would people think it more appropriate to remove it? Everyone is entitled to there opinion whether others agree or not Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 10:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it was fine to ask the person once and I don't think you should remove your question. Acalamari said above "They should also be asked why they oppose," which is what concerned me...you and he had already asked the question and I didn't think it was necessary or appropriate to continue asking them to clarify their position or to encourage other people to do so. Once was fine, but more than that and it starts to look like ganging up and interrogation, IMO. Cheers, Sarah 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed it now after reviewing this discussion. Acalamari 15:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * User:JCraw has now clarified his position on my talk page here. Mystery solved. Apparently, he had misinterpreted the RFA as something else - Alison ☺ 17:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Manopingo
Hi all. Unfortunately, User:Manopingo (now closed) informs me that he's the anon that made the somewhat negative comment which I replied to in the RFA. In light of the fact that the guy's been trolling my RFA under two names, that his 'manopingo' account is now closed and that I have now just become aware of it, I request that his support vote be reviewed in the interests of fairness and lack of ambiguity. Transparency, folks - Alison ☺ 19:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)