Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Berig 2

Edit count for Berig
User:Berig

run at Sat Oct 25 20:51:21 2008 GMT

Category:             57 Image:                155 Mainspace             12373 Portal:               2 Talk:                 3681 Template talk:        131 Template:             93 User talk:            963 User:                 290 Wikipedia talk:       104 Wikipedia:            491 avg edits per page    3.79 earliest              16:59, 18 August 2006 number of unique pages 4841 total                 18340

2006/8 62   2006/9  1262   2006/10 661   2006/11 1204   2006/12 859   2007/1  1646   2007/2  82   2007/3  18   2007/4  274   2007/5  3000   2007/6  1943   2007/7  667   2007/8  516   2007/9  253   2007/10 828   2007/11 476   2007/12 87   2008/1  51   2008/2  786   2008/3  691   2008/4  873   2008/5  873   2008/6  425   2008/7  494   2008/8  136   2008/9  118   2008/10 55

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 375 [2]Greece Runestones 307 [3]Hro�gar 194 [4]Ingvar Runestones 174 [5]Beowulf 170 [6]Varangian Runestones 159 [7]Runestone 132 [8]England Runestones 129 [9]Jarlabanke Runestones 126 [10]Viking Runestones 120 [11]Viking funeral 102 [12]D�s 101 [13]V�lva 100 [14]Halga 95 [15]Eadgils 82 [16]Swedes (Germanic tribe)

Talk: 96 [17]King of the Geats 90 [18]Eadgils 85 [19]Estonian pirates 76 [20]Old Norse 65 [21]House of Muns� 65 [22]Beowulf 63 [23]Germanic peoples 58 [24]Swedes (Germanic tribe) 51 [25]History of Sweden (800-1521) 42 [26]Ragnvald Ulfsson 33 [27]Br�singamen 29 [28]Gothiscandza 29 [29]Goths 28 [30]Kj�rr 27 [31]Scandinavia

Category: 5 [32]Rune- and picture stones on Gotland 5 [33]Danish Runic Inscriptions 4 [34]Runestones, Estrid 4 [35]Geats 3 [36]Heroes in Norse myths and legends 3 [37]Varangians 2 [38]Jutes 2 [39]Ha�uwulf's runestones 2 [40]Runestones raised in memory of women 2 [41]English heroic legends 2 [42]People in Norse mythology and legends 2 [43]Viking Age women 2 [44]Runestones in memory of Viking warriors 2 [45]Runestones in Sm�land

Image: 7 [46]Uffe den spake.jpg 7 [47]Skjold kaares til konge.jpg 5 [48]Haugsetting2.jpg 5 [49]Hr�lfr Kraki's last stand.jpg 4 [50]Eric the victorious.jpg 4 [51]Haugsetting.jpg 4 [52]England runestones.jpg 3 [53]Eric's kingdom (870s).png 3 [54]Greece runestones.JPG 3 [55]Norns1.jpg 3 [56]Bloodeagle.jpg 2 [57]Dalrunor.png 2 [58]C.F. Christensen 1833.jpg 2 [59]Dotted m-rune.jpg 2 [60]Norns3by CEBrock.jpg

Portal: 2 [61]Ancient Germanic culture/Selected picture/3

Template: 11 [62]Runestones 8 [63]Infobox Runestone 7 [64]Uruz infobox 6 [65]Myarchive 4 [66]Germanic peoples 3 [67]WPMILHIST Announcements/Nordic military history 3 [68]Othalan infobox 3 [69]V�lsung 3 [70]Germanic tribes (750 BC - 1 AD) 3 [71]Hrethling 3 [72]Ansuz infobox 2 [73]Scandinavia 2 [74]Odin 2 [75]Ingwaz infobox 2 [76]Germanic philology

Template talk: 109 [77]Did you know 16 [78]Germanic peoples 4  [79]Germanic tribes (750 BC - 1 AD) 2  [80]Germanic philology

User: 206 [81]Berig/workspace 75 [82]Berig 2  [83]Drieakko 2  [84]Pia L

User talk: 294 [85]Berig 86 [86]Haukurth 41 [87]Pia L   41  [88]Varoon Arya 39 [89]Briangotts 37 [90]Bloodofox 32 [91]Dbachmann 19 [92]Dr Steven Plunkett 17 [93]Frater Xyzzy 14 [94]Ghirlandajo 14 [95]Skadinaujo 13 [96]Goldenrowley 11 [97]Grimhelm 11 [98]Drieakko 11 [99]FrummerThanThou/Archive 1

Wikipedia: 31 [100]WikiProject Norse history and culture 28 [101]Fringe theories/Noticeboard 18 [102]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies/Runes 10 [103]Peer review/Hro�gar/archive1 10 [104]Featured article review/Sverre of Norway/archive1 7 [105]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 6 [106]Requests for adminship/Berig 6 [107]Reliable sources/Noticeboard 4 [108]WikiProject Military history/Nordic military history task force 4 [109]Articles for deletion/Britney Spears Song 4 [110]Deletion review/Log/2008 July 25 4 [111]Articles for deletion/BSAUA 4 [112]Articles for deletion/Psilalonia Square 4 [113]Images and media for deletion/2008 June 20 4 [114]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies

Wikipedia talk: 33 [115]WikiProject Military history/Nordic military history task force 21 [116]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies 18 [117]WikiProject Norse history and culture 11 [118]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies/Runes 7 [119]Good articles 5 [120]Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Terminology 2 [121]Civility 2 [122]Reliable sources 2 [123]Footnotes

If there were any problems, please [124]email Interiot or post at  [125]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 20:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC).

Size of A Nobody
Just wondering, but how long did it take you to write that? RockManQ (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not time myself, but I would say several minutes as I looked at every discussion in which we both participated, checked block logs, looked over the candidate's userpage, wrote up a thorough comment as I did so, proofread it, etc. I figure if I am going to bother to comment in these, I want to make sure I add something new to the discussion that someone else has not yet said and that is comprehensive enough to be fair and clear.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 01:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, might just be me, but it always seems your rationales keep getting longer (support or oppose). Not that that's a bad thing. RockManQ  (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, if I just said oppose for the reasons I wanted to oppose, someone would say here or on my talk page that I am only opposing because we disagreed in certain discussions, which wouldn't actually be true, because I never really just consider one aspect of an admin candidate when I look at them for an RfA. So, I increasingly find myself having to make as comprehensive of a rationale as possible.  Plus, as I indicate in my oppose, I really do value well thought out and unique contributions to discussions and think it's important to present information and ideas not considered by others.  But I better stop myself from rambling! :)  --A NobodyMy talk 03:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with longer reationales---especially in the oppose section. It shows that the person did in fact research the candidate before !voting.  It also substantiates the !vote.  I'd rather see a long well reasoned rationale, than a short "Oppose, don't like how candidates votes at AfD's."--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 05:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Detailed (rather than merely "long" - substance is the key) rationales can influence other editors, which is useful, and can be very helpful to Crats. --Dweller (talk) 20:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)