Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cyclonenim 2

Edit count for Cyclonenim
User:Cyclonenim

run at Sun Jul 13 15:20:38 2008 GMT

Category talk:        1 Category:             27 Mainspace             1697 Portal:               38 Talk:                 1062 Template:             38 User talk:            585 User:                 367 Wikipedia talk:       32 Wikipedia:            523 avg edits per page    1.89 earliest              20:20, 6 June 2006 number of unique pages 2315 total                 4370

2006/6 4   2006/7  2   2006/8  22   2006/9  0   2006/10 10   2006/11 27   2006/12 9   2007/1  10   2007/2  4   2007/3  0   2007/4  0   2007/5  36   2007/6  0   2007/7  1   2007/8  1   2007/9  9   2007/10 0   2007/11 0   2007/12 27   2008/1  430   2008/2  175   2008/3  49   2008/4  671   2008/5  2133   2008/6  558   2008/7  192

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 85 [2]Zygomycosis 50 [3]Teardrop (band) 42 [4]Subarachnoid hemorrhage 38 [5]S�zary's disease 35 [6]Chondrocalcinosis 29 [7]Hypereosinophilic syndrome 25 [8]Tolosa-Hunt syndrome 24 [9]Adie syndrome 22 [10]Ventricular hypertrophy 20 [11]Alice in Wonderland syndrome 18 [12]Pectus excavatum 16 [13]Stroke 15 [14]Trichlormethiazide 15 [15]Kick (soft drink) 15 [16]Rocket propellant

Talk: 44 [17]Subarachnoid hemorrhage 15 [18]Zygomycosis 12 [19]Pectus excavatum 11 [20]Subcutaneous emphysema 8 [21]Physical therapy 7 [22]Oil price increases since 2003 7 [23]Stroke 6 [24]Headache 5 [25]Main Page 5 [26]Ascending cholangitis 5 [27]Lymphatic system 5 [28]Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis 5 [29]Long-term effects of alcohol 4 [30]2007-2008 Writers Guild of America strike 4 [31]Rheumatoid arthritis

Category: 3 [32]FA-Class neurology articles 3 [33]Start-Class neurology articles 2 [34]Stub-Class neurology articles 2 [35]B-Class neurology articles 2 [36]FL-Class neurology articles 2 [37]Low-importance neurology articles 2 [38]Unassessed-Class neurology articles 2 [39]A-Class neurology articles

Portal: 14 [40]Medicine/Did you know archive 9 [41]Medicine/Did you know 4 [42]Medicine/Selected article candidates 4 [43]Medicine/Things you can do   3  [44]Medicine/WikiProjects 2 [45]Medicine/Quotes archive 2 [46]Medicine/Selected article/49, 2007

Template: 8 [47]WikiProject Neurology 6 [48]User Good Articles2 5 [49]Vandalism information 4 [50]WPN Navigation 2 [51]RD-med 2 [52]User Good Articles 2 [53]Neurotrauma

User: 240 [54]Cyclonenim 21 [55]Cyclonenim/Sandbox 20 [56]Cyclonenim/monobook.js   10  [57]Cyclonenim/Icons 8  [58]Pedro/Mentoring 7  [59]Cyclonenim/Contributions/Archive2 6  [60]Cyclonenim/Status 5  [61]Cyclonenim/NavBox 5  [62]Cyclonenim/huggle.css 4  [63]Cyclonenim/Guestbook 3  [64]Mdebets 3  [65]Cyclonenim/RfA questions 3  [66]Cyclonenim/QuiFriends 2  [67]CycloneNimrod 2  [68]AmiDaniel/VP/Approval

User talk: 66 [69]Cyclonenim 33 [70]Delldot 31 [71]Jfdwolff 15 [72]KC Panchal 12 [73]Stevenfruitsmaak 9 [74]Ged3000 8 [75]Stepshep 8 [76]Pozilla 8 [77]NCurse 7 [78]Steve Crossin 7 [79]Travellingcari 6 [80]Pedro 5 [81]Elncid 4 [82]PeeJay2K3 4 [83]J.delanoy

Wikipedia: 150 [84]Reference desk/Science 34 [85]Administrator intervention against vandalism 18 [86]WikiProject Neurology 14 [87]WikiProject Neurology/List of articles 14 [88]Requests for adminship/Cyclonenim 13 [89]WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Week 12 [90]Bot requests 11 [91]Requests for adminship/Travellingcari 9  [92]Requests for adminship/PeeJay2K3 (2) 7  [93]WikiProject Medicine/Participants 7  [94]Miscellany for deletion 6  [95]Sandbox 6  [96]Requests for adminship/Aitias 2 5  [97]Requests for adminship/Slp1 5  [98]Requests for adminship/Jbmurray

Wikipedia talk: 10 [99]Requests for adminship 8 [100]WikiProject Neurology 3 [101]Reference desk 3 [102]About 2 [103]WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Week

If there were any problems, please [104]email Interiot or post at  [105]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 15:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC).

Oppose by User:The Great Editor In Chief

 * 1) This user appears to need more training in the Wikipedia field. He seems confused and unready.--I Am The Great Editor in Chief (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This from an editor who has been with us for less than a month! MSGJ (talk) 16:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Honestly, it really does not matter how old an account is as long as it is not like 5 days. I admit that TGEIC's comment leaves something to be desired but Ad hominem oppose badgers are not the answer. -Icĕwedg Ё  (ťalķ) 16:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Ad hominem responses has no place here, even to flimsy arguments. - Mailer Diablo 16:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note the previous RfA from this editor that was closed per WP:NOTNOW by the candidate. Many thanks, Gazimoff Write Read 16:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Struck after xenocidic's supplemental information about the RfA not being closed by the candidate and not appearing to be transcluded. Gazimoff Write Read 17:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Confused about what? And I don't see how time per se is a factor--some people are quick learners. Cosmic Latte (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) *Comment. I haven't decided which way to go on this candidate yet, but this is clearly a bad-faith oppose, based upon Cycloneim's NOTNOW close comment on the !voter's RfA. S. Dean Jameson 16:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That RFA is not closed and in fact doesn't appear to have ever been transcluded. – xeno cidic  ( talk ) 16:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

strike?
My feeling is that the oppose vote by User:The Great Editor In Chief should struck down. The editor has been engaged in severely disruptive behavior in his short time on WP, he is now indef blocked and even his own talk page has been protected to disallow him further access. Basically a functional equivalent of a banned user. See the details at User talk:The Great Editor In Chief. Nsk92 (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I've added a note, we'll have to leave it up to the crats to determine an appropriate weighting. I would also support the whole exchange being transplanted over here, leaving just his vote and my note. – xeno  ( talk ) 18:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are probably right. Upon reflection, I also think it is a good idea to move the entire exchange regarding his vote here and to leave it to closing bureaucrats to deal with it. Also, a note to those who will look at his talk page: please check his block log as well. Initially that user was indef blocked for an inappropriate user name and then the block was modified to an indef block for disruption (the talk page does not make that very clear). Nsk92 (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅, see above. – xeno  ( talk ) 18:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do not strike out any vote. Mark it so that for a deciding bureaucrat can decide. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  08:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)