Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Dpmuk

Username:	Dpmuk User groups:	reviewer, rollbacker First edit:	Aug 20, 2007 00:16:52 Unique pages edited:	3,448 Average edits per page:	2.13 Live edits:	6,531 Deleted edits:	824 Total edits (including deleted):	7,355

Namespace Totals

Article	2375	36.37% Talk	1006	15.40% User	194	2.97% User talk	1784	27.32% Wikipedia	840	12.86% Wikipedia talk	208	3.18% File	23	0.35% File talk	2	0.03% MediaWiki talk	1	0.02% Template	65	1.00% Template talk	23	0.35% Category	6	0.09% Category talk	2	0.03% Portal	2	0.03% Namespace Totals Pie Chart Month counts 2007/08	4 	2007/09	0 	2007/10	0 	2007/11	6 	2007/12	15 	2008/01	4 	2008/02	1 	2008/03	1 	2008/04	5 	2008/05	0 	2008/06	265 	2008/07	123 	2008/08	195 	2008/09	317 	2008/10	15 	2008/11	0 	2008/12	0 	2009/01	19 	2009/02	81 	2009/03	231 	2009/04	98 	2009/05	127 	2009/06	52 	2009/07	283 	2009/08	40 	2009/09	143 	2009/10	232 	2009/11	12 	2009/12	15 	2010/01	8 	2010/02	7 	2010/03	89 	2010/04	117 	2010/05	195 	2010/06	133 	2010/07	127 	2010/08	228 	2010/09	25 	2010/10	67 	2010/11	232 	2010/12	141 	2011/01	731 	2011/02	464 	2011/03	204 	2011/04	97 	2011/05	150 	2011/06	182 	2011/07	43 	2011/08	7 	2011/09	15 	2011/10	136 	2011/11	105 	2011/12	173 	2012/01	341 	2012/02	230

Top edited pages Article

49 - West_Ham_United_F.C.   27 - Chelmsford 14 - Engkanto 13 - 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_disciplinary_record 11 - Miralem_Sulejmani 10 - Laguna_State_Polytechnic_University 10 - Classified_information 10 - Skin_Hunters 9 - Lake_Holiday,_Virginia 7 - Exxaro

Talk

23 - Contact_fuze 17 - Hurricane_Karl_(2010) 15 - Sexually_transmitted_disease 14 - Corvette 14 - Skin_Hunters 10 - Chili_con_carne 9 - Harvey's_Dream 8 - Libyan_civil_war 8 - Kartvelian_languages 8 - Windscreen_wiper

User

28 - Dpmuk/TemplateSandbox 19 - Dpmuk/Sandbox 11 - Dpmuk/SchoolNotice 10 - Dpmuk/Slovaks_in_Hungary_discussion 9 - Dpmuk 7 - CorenSearchBot/exclude 6 - Dpmuk/TemplateSandbox2 3 - Nuujinn/Slovaks_in_Hungary 2 - TTquaternary 2 - Catanzaro

User talk

134 - Moonriddengirl 67 - Dpmuk 23 - JaGa 16 - Fastily 15 - Harej 15 - VernoWhitney 13 - Eliko 12 - Sarah777 10 - JzG 10 - Anthony_Appleyard/2011/January-March

Wikipedia

173 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents 45 - Requested_moves 15 - Contributor_copyright_investigations/Vanished_6551... 13 - Sockpuppet_investigations/Tobias_Conradi 10 - Administrators'_noticeboard 9 - Editor_assistance/Requests 7 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism 7 - Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_February_2 7 - Requests_for_comment/Sarah777_2 6 - Articles_for_deletion/Walter_J._West

Wikipedia talk

33 - Requested_moves 26 - Protection_policy 13 - Copyrights 10 - Naming_conventions_(capitalization) 7 - Copyright_problems 7 - WikiProject_International_relations 6 - Userfication 6 - WikiProject_Copyright_Cleanup 5 - Copying_within_Wikipedia 5 - Criteria_for_speedy_deletion

File

2 - Antpius.jpg 2 - TAGAirlines.jpg 1 - Volusian1.jpg 1 - Trajan_decius.jpg 1 - Plautilla.jpg 1 - Old-gmpte-logo.png 1 - Julia_mamaea.jpg 1 - Henry_VI_Groat.jpg 1 - Richard_III_Penny.jpg 1 - George_II_coin.jpg

File talk

1 - Portrait_of_Edward_James.jpg 1 - Toronto_Subway_Train_Type_H2_Interior.jpg

MediaWiki talk

1 - Wikimedia-copyrightwarning

Template

4 - AFC_submission/misplaced 3 - UK_motorways 3 - Copyviocore 3 - Bishops_of_Limerick,_Ardfert_and_Aghadoe 2 - Uw-speedy1 2 - Admin_backlog/doc 2 - Move-multi/doc 2 - RMassist 2 - Centralized_discussion 2 - Colchester

Template talk

14 - Cv-unsure 2 - Copyviocore 1 - Db-meta 1 - Bus_companies_in_England 1 - Bishops_of_Limerick,_Ardfert_and_Aghadoe 1 - Christian_Mysticism 1 - MLB 1 - LDS_Temple/Cebu_City_Philippines_Temple 1 - Infobox_station

Category

2 - Copied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections_with_url_p... 2 - Copied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections 1 - Professional_wrestling_trainers 1 - Executions_at_the_Tower_of_London

Category talk

1 - Great_Backlog_Drive_2010 1 - Geography_of_the_Sakha_Republic

Portal

1 - Contents/Portals/Culture_and_the_arts 1 - Current_events/2005_May_11

Answers to StephenBuxton's optional question
Dpmuk (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) A tory liar
 * This is not a valid R3 as it has been around for two years and R3 requires it to have been recently created. I would however delete as a G10.  Although this title is strictly true as he was a member of the Conservative, or Tory, party and he has been found guilty of perjury, hence a liar, I still see several problems with this redirect.  I think my biggest problem with it is that it implies we are somehow making a judgement call that he is the most important "tory liar" and in doing so we violate NPOV as we have no evidence for that.  There is also the problem that a redirect like this does not provide a balanced, NPOV as it is quite possible someone will find and follow the redirect and not actually read the article and so make the connection between tory liar and Archer without any context or opposing views.  I would check what links here to make sure the redirect hadn't been used but other than that, as the user is already blocked, there would be little follow up.
 * 1) Deben High School
 * Not a valid A7 as schools are specifically excluded from A7 and even without that, given the precedence AfD, just being a high school is a sign of possible (indeed probable) notability. The first thing I'd probably do is a google search to try to find out more about the school, mainly where it is and what name the school itself uses so that I could attempt to see if we already have an article on the school under a slightly different name.  If I found such a page I'd redirect and leave the user a note.  If not and I'd found out where the school was I'd wikilink the relevant text and keep the page watchlisted for a bit as it had only recently been edited and they might expand it.  If that had not been done after a day or so I would consider redirecting to the town / school district or somewhere similar if such an article mentioned the school as in it's current state the article provides no more information.  If on the other hand I had not been able to identify the school they were referring to I'd drop the user a note and keep my eye on the article with an eye to A1ing it if nothing was added to it in a reasonable amount of time.
 * 1) Malcom Hardee
 * Definite G10 in my opinion. Even in the unlikely event that he really did "ram a firework up his butt and set fire to it and run around naked" the way it's been worded makes it an attack.  It would also be a valid A7 so even without that sentence I would still delete (I can expand on what I'd do in this case if required).  I'd look at the user's other contributions and if there were none or the others were clearly good faith I'd explain to the user a bit more why it was unacceptable - it's clearly not appropriate to me but this may be less obvious to some, e.g. a teenager.  If there were more attack like or otherwise problematic edits in their history then a block would be in order.
 * 1) New article
 * I don't think this is vandalism as I'd assume good faith and assume they were either testing or were not aware how Wikipedia worked. As such I'd delete under A3 (G2 is also valid).  I'd then drop the user that created the page a note saying the I didn't find the edit vandalism, let them know that their free to remove stuff from their talk page and give them a welcome message.  I'd then let the tagger know that I personally didn't find the edit vandalism and explain why.
 * 1) Wizzy Wig the Clown
 * Definitely not an A7 in my opinion. The claims to having appeared on television etc are enough signs of possible notability to get above the A7 bar.  I'd do a search myself and see if I could find any references if not I'd tag as a BLPPROD and if I could I'd add a reference or two and add a stub tag.  I'd drop the creator a message about possible conflict of interest and leave the tagger a message as to why I didn't find it an A7.
 * 1) Athur the Great
 * Well I'd delete as an A7. As the user appears to be a child and they've revealed personal information I'd also inform over sight.  I'd then probably post a message at ANI asking someone to post a message to the user as I'll admit this isn't a situation I've come across and so would be unsure how to write such a message.  In most cases if I were unsure how to follow through I'd leave it to another admin in the first place but in this instance, given the circumstances, it's more important it was dealt with quickly.
 * 1) Sudar Barash
 * I'd pass on dealing with this one as there is some information there that could be signs of notability (the nine digits comment and the size of the showroom) but I don't know enough on the topic to know if these are run of the mill figures or highly impressive. As such I'd probably leave the whole issue for another admin to deal with so the user was dealing with fewer people but I do note that there are user name and conflict of interest concerns as well.