Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/E2eamon

e2eamon's edit stats using X!'s edit counter as of 19:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC):

Username:	E2eamon User groups:	autoreviewer, reviewer, rollbacker First edit:	Mar 08, 2009 18:09:34 Unique pages edited:	7,807 Average edits per page:	1.29 Live edits:	9,520 Deleted edits:	523 Total edits (including deleted):	10,043

Namespace Totals

Article	4121	43.29% Talk	142	1.49% User	224	2.35% User talk	4171	43.81% Wikipedia	609	6.40% Wikipedia talk	26	0.27% File	20	0.21% Template	52	0.55% Template talk	142	1.49% Help	1	0.01% Category	3	0.03% Category talk	2	0.02% Portal	7	0.07% Namespace Totals Pie Chart Month counts 2009/03	1 	2009/04	0 	2009/05	0 	2009/06	0 	2009/07	0 	2009/08	0 	2009/09	0 	2009/10	0 	2009/11	0 	2009/12	0 	2010/01	0 	2010/02	285 	2010/03	933 	2010/04	732 	2010/05	17 	2010/06	527 	2010/07	33 	2010/08	322 	2010/09	348 	2010/10	302 	2010/11	17 	2010/12	1 	2011/01	1 	2011/02	1674 	2011/03	2644 	2011/04	251 	2011/05	40 	2011/06	1265 	2011/07	127

Top edited pages Article

76 - Disi_Water_Conveyance_Project 21 - List_of_cities_and_unincorporated_communities_in_O... 19 - ICE_Bridge 17 - Beating_heart_cadaver 13 - Flapless_Air_Vehicle_Integrated_Industrial_Researc... 10 - Ethics_AdviceLine_for_Journalists 10 - Center_for_Ocean_Exploration_and_Archaeological_Oc... 10 - Meiyintang_collection 10 - Rehydroxylation_dating 10 - Real_Medicine_Foundation

Talk

9 - Disi_Water_Conveyance_Project 6 - Time 6 - 2011_Tōhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami 4 - Zeus 3 - Westboro_Baptist_Church 2 - Mark_Sanchez 2 - Monkey 2 - Pierre_McGuire 2 - Dog 1 - Niagara,_Oregon

User

106 - E2eamon 22 - E2eamon/sandbox 16 - E2eamon/awards 11 - E2eamon/wikiguides 9 - E2eamon/monobook.js   6 - E2eamon/sanbox2 4 - E2eamon/Taylor-Dunn 3 - E2eamon/sandbox3 3 - E2eamon/user_time 3 - Athaenara/Gallery

User talk

58 - E2eamon 6 - Chrishmt0423 5 - ISAIAH_13:5 5 - Calvinbarber 4 - Crazymonkey1123 4 - 77.160.213.16   4 - 213.107.93.242    4 - 82.33.45.105    4 - 49.193.194.42    4 - 207.235.203.27

Wikipedia

104 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism 10 - Requests_for_adminship/e2eamon 8 - New_contributors'_help_page/questions 6 - Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_March_3 5 - Usernames_for_administrator_attention 4 - Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Forum_User/Duck-famil... 4 - Requests_for_page_protection 4 - Requests_for_feedback/2011_February_23 4 - Editor_review 3 - New_admin_school/Deleting/delete

Wikipedia talk

8 - WikiProject_Oregon 4 - WikiProject_Jazz 3 - WikiProject_Spaceflight 3 - Wiki_Guides 2 - Credo_accounts 1 - User_pages 1 - File_copyright_tags/Free_licenses 1 - Articles_for_creation/Koushik_Basu 1 - Sandbox 1 - Copy-paste

File

6 - Disi_water_conveyance_project_pipes.jpg 1 - No._5,_1948.jpg 1 - Rihanna_PonDeReplay.ogg 1 - Jacob_Black2.jpg 1 - CodeOrgan_Screenshot.JPG 1 - WTCLogo.gif 1 - JFKMedicalCenterLogo.jpg 1 - Pi_digits_distribution_update.png 1 - RealMedicineFoundationLogo.png 1 - MapendoLogo.png

Template

14 - Did_you_know/Preparation_area_3 13 - Did_you_know/Preparation_area_1 4 - Did_you_know/Preparation_area_2 3 - Nihongo2 1 - Current_time_box 1 - Infobox_instrument/Color 1 - USVirginIslands-footy-bio-stub 1 - Gucci_Mane 1 - Karateka 1 - Cite_doi/10.1073.2Fpnas.0606291103

Template talk

140 - Did_you_know 1 - U.S._Congressional_opposition_to_war 1 - Justin_Bieber

Help

1 - Edit_summary/feedback

Category

1 - Religion_in_Ghana 1 - Explorers_of_Canada 1 - Politics_of_World_War_II

Category talk

1 - Environment_of_Hong_Kong 1 - Buildings_and_structures_in_Kabul

Portal

1 - Israel/Introduction 1 - History/Featured_article/March,_2011 1 - Mathematics/Selected_article/17 1 - Biography/WikiProjects 1 - Ancient_Egypt/Intro 1 - History/Featured_article/June,_2011 1 - Contents/Technology_and_applied_sciences/Intro

Paraphrasing: Disi Water Conveyance Project
The IEEE journalist wrote this passage, 100 million cubic meters of water will travel from the desert to two reservoirs each year. About 40 million cubic meters will go to the Abu Alanda reservoir (1) and mix with some surface water from Wala (2) and treated brackish water from the Zara Ma’en desalination plant (3). The other 60 million cubic meters will go to the Dabouq reservoir (4) and blend with Wala surface water and the output of the Zai Treatment Plant (5), which treats water from the King Abdullah Canal (6). Amman’s used water is sent to the As Samra Wastewater Treatment Plant (7) and later used for irrigation. which was paraphrased by candidate e2eamon: The 100,000,000 m3 of water will be divided between the Abu Alanda reservoir and the Dabouq reservoir. Approximately 40,000,000 m3 of water will be sent to the Abu Alanda reservoir where it will be diluted with water from the Zara Ma’en desalination plant as well as water from Wala. The remaining 60,000,000 m3 of water will be sent to the Dabouq reservoir where it will be diluted with water from the Zai Treatment Plant as well as water from Wala. This good-article lacks page references. I provided one for a fact from the Heinrich Böll foundation report (not a journal), but I couldn't find another fact anywhere about 190 MCM, and left a tag. These were the only 2 sources that I checked in the article. Kiefer .Wolfowitz 01:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * For the 190 MCM- 190 is the proposed total extraction rate. It is not in the source.  However, the current extraction in 90 MCM (sourced).  The proposed additional extraction for the new project is 100 MCM (sourced).  100+90=190 MCM total when the proposed additional extraction is combined with the current extraction. --  E♴  (talk)  02:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Also- this was also brought up in the GA review which can be seen on the talk page. -- E♴  (talk)  02:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I looked again, and I cannot find the 100 MCM in the cited document. (Such addition would be permissible arithmetic and not synthesis.) Kiefer .Wolfowitz 02:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It may not be in that specific source. Look at the first sentence of the design section.  There are three sources for that sentence and the first one confirms the 100 MCM.  I did not check the other two, but I believe they confirm it as well. The 100 MCM is also in the lead and is confirmed by the sources following the lead. --  E♴  (talk)  02:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I made a short edit: Is it okay now? Best regards, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 03:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes- it does seem to be a little clearer the way you put it. -- E♴  (talk)  04:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Feel free to fix any errors I've made! It's nice that RfA's directly improve articles! :-)
 * Of course, others can see how you respond to questions.
 * Imho: RfAs also offer an informal and seemingly productive arena for discussing policy and standards. For example, after last week, I am more conscious of the problems of paraphrasing and copyright violations, and more familiar with WP:BLP [especially with prolonging victimization] issues.
 * Sincerely, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 06:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I made some more edits. You were crediting an investment company, Zawya (or similar), for articles that they republished/hosted from The Jordan Times, even though every page there credited TJT. Further, TJT identified their sources, by name or as an anonymous source, and you sometimes did not, even though such sources were always identified as being part of the project. I noted that the image of the pipes came from General Electric. Of course, there is a lot of money in this project, and it is essential to identify the sources.

Would you make a tree diagram showing the ownership relationships among the companies? It seems General Electric is at the top. I found it confusing that there were so many organizations involved, which often were GE subidiaries. Kiefer .Wolfowitz 23:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Beating heart cadaver: DYK and (failed) GA nomination
This DYK had 2 problems. It lacked a page reference. The subject "doctors" was wrong, because the source specified "intensive care unit staff", which in practice would mean that nurses would do much of the work. (The source's page had an anecdote about CWRU's UH/CC physicians, which may have prompted the error.) Amazon displays the source (p. 170),: which was paraphrased by the candidate as "The procedure for caring for a beating heart cadaver is the same as caring for a normal patient. The cadaver must be monitered at all times, and if neccessary, "life saving" procedures must be taken. Since the brain does not function, the hormone levels and blood pressure must be regulated by doctors to keep the organs alive. "

In April of 2010, the candidate nominated the article for GA status, which was denied, because of the inadequate referencing (Reliability problems and failure to provide adequate references). For example, the CWRU physicians wrote an article in NEJM, which was not used as a source. Kiefer .Wolfowitz 02:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * To be fair, not understanding the GA criteria over one year ago shouldn't really be a problem for admins. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  17:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * True, true! Yet, Peirce was right that the desire to know the truth about a question, to really know it, is the most important quality for intellectual success. I just want one article where the candidate really has demonstrated hunger and determination to find the best sources and make them accessible.
 * The Jordan-water article did look like a much better effort about a very difficult topic, and probably a B-class article: But page references really would have brought a smile to my face! Kiefer .Wolfowitz 23:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)