Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter

Fluffernutter's edit stats using X!'s edit counter as of 16:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC): Username:	Fluffernutter User groups:	autoreviewer, filemover, reviewer, rollbacker First edit:	Apr 16, 2008 12:57:55 Unique pages edited:	6,782 Average edits per page:	1.95 Live edits:	12,771 Deleted edits:	482 Total edits (including deleted):	13,253

Namespace Totals

Article	9297	72.80% Talk	343	2.69% User	222	1.74% User talk	2209	17.30% Wikipedia	372	2.91% Wikipedia talk	96	0.75% File	143	1.12% File talk	8	0.06% Template	52	0.41% Template talk	13	0.10% Help	2	0.02% Help talk	11	0.09% Category	3	0.02% Namespace Totals Pie Chart Month counts 2008/04	9 	2008/05	119 	2008/06	267 	2008/07	188 	2008/08	148 	2008/09	229 	2008/10	223 	2008/11	249 	2008/12	116 	2009/01	54 	2009/02	131 	2009/03	97 	2009/04	97 	2009/05	95 	2009/06	174 	2009/07	236 	2009/08	160 	2009/09	126 	2009/10	248 	2009/11	109 	2009/12	193 	2010/01	188 	2010/02	227 	2010/03	311 	2010/04	74 	2010/05	16 	2010/06	59 	2010/07	9 	2010/08	20 	2010/09	493 	2010/10	1122 	2010/11	292 	2010/12	296 	2011/01	259 	2011/02	604 	2011/03	332 	2011/04	200 	2011/05	734 	2011/06	1677 	2011/07	2363 	2011/08	227

Top edited pages Article

87 - Whoopi_Goldberg 82 - Virtual_Magic_Kingdom 67 - It_(novel) 66 - Stephen_King 66 - Shih_Tzu 63 - Chihuahua_(dog) 56 - The_Phantom_of_the_Opera 53 - Hamster 52 - Antonio_López_de_Santa_Anna 43 - Kaycee_Nicole

Talk

23 - Watson_(computer) 15 - The_Mousetrap 12 - Stephen_King 11 - Willamette_River/GA1 10 - Catfish_(film) 8 - It_(novel) 7 - Harold_Covington 6 - Wirtland_(micronation) 6 - Salem_witch_trials 5 - Horacio_Gutiérrez

User

107 - Fluffernutter 37 - Fluffernutter/CSD_log 10 - Fluffernutter/vector.js   8 - Fluffernutter/PROD_log 8 - Fluffernutter/History 6 - Fluffernutter/huggle.css 5 - Fluffernutter/Sandbox 4 - Chzz/dsc0511 4 - Fluffernutter/Mentorship 3 - Fluffernutter/twinkleoptions.js

User talk

120 - Fluffernutter 6 - Vasudeomangal 6 - FinanceQ 5 - 86.174.93.168   5 - Najamirah 5 - 72.11.253.203   5 - A.montenegro 5 - Emrgmgmtca 5 - Maryphillips1952 4 - 4.53.85.2

Wikipedia

61 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism 28 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents 18 - Requests_for_page_protection 18 - Huggle/Whitelist 13 - Meetup/NYC/Wiki-Conference/2009 11 - Requests_for_comment/Arbitration_Committee 8 - Meetup/NYC/April_2011 7 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring 7 - Sockpuppet_investigations/Wallflowers98 7 - Village_pump_(miscellaneous)

Wikipedia talk

14 - Meetup/NYC/March_2011 8 - Village_pump_(proposals)/Proposal_to_require_autoc... 7 - Spoiler 6 - Meetup/NYC/October_2010 5 - Meetup/NYC/Wiki-Conference/2009 3 - WikiProject_Military_history 3 - WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors 3 - Wiknic 2 - Requests_for_adminship 2 - Meetup/NYC/June_2011

File

2 - Dish_india_logo.png 1 - DaB.jpg 1 - DJ_Damian_P.jpg 1 - Dimanche_à_Bamako_album_cover.jpg 1 - Dortmunder_Actien_Brauerei_beer_bottle.jpg 1 - Damage_(superhero).jpg 1 - Damage_rune.JPG 1 - Damage.JPG 1 - KDDB_102.7_(Da_bomb)_logo.jpg 1 - Da_Bomb_(Kris_Kross_album_cover).jpg

File talk

1 - GALENA1.jpg 1 - Damage.JPG 1 - USS_Galena.jpg 1 - Damage_rune.JPG 1 - Damage_(superhero).jpg 1 - Dicktracy_(mural).jpg 1 - Ghost_Trick_Phantom_Detective_screenshot.jpg 1 - Ghost_Trick_Phantom_Detective_cover_art.jpg

Template

5 - Bronze_Age 4 - Airports_in_Greece 4 - LDS_sects/Granville_Hedrick 3 - 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_Group_A 2 - Biome 2 - Tamil_Nadu_legislative_election_results_by_allianc... 2 - Latest_preview_software_release/iOS 2 - 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_Group_A/doc 1 - Changwon_LG_Sakers_roster 1 - 2011_BFL_playoffs

Template talk

9 - Did_you_know 2 - LDS_sects/Granville_Hedrick 1 - Cleanup-IPA 1 - UNSCEAR_RE_type

Help

1 - MediaWiki_namespace 1 - HTML_in_wikitext

Help talk

9 - Contents/draft 1 - Contents 1 - Minor_edit

Category

3 - Recipients_of_the_Military_Cross

Someone explain to me...
Why are there questions about exploding editors and rampaging sentient bots on this RfA? Lady of  Shalott  00:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Possibly because the RfA appears headed for what, in another space-time continuum, would be a WP:SNOW granting of the mop, and this is all that's left in the bucket to try and trip the editor up. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * There's an odd question from Keepscases because there's always an odd question from Keepscases; some have been much worse than this one, and I really enjoyed Fluffernutter's deadpan response. The others I can't speak to. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've seen some of Keepscases's other questions. Fluffernutter handled the situation(s) well. I'm just not sure there should have been such for her to answer. Lady  of  Shalott  02:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not disagreeing with you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems some editors have a purpose other than gauging the candidate's qualifications/abilities in regard to adminship. I give her credit for even entertaining some of them. Lara  03:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the vast majority of participants disregard these absurdist questions and the answers given (or not given), although it is an opportunity for some administrator candidates to show good cheer.  Cullen 328 [[User talk:Cullen328| ''Let's

discuss it'' ]] 03:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it could be a kinda illustration that The Fluff is very hard to phase! We trust her ability to deal in an open and friendly manner with all kinds of rampant insanity, and be able to tell the safely insane from the real damage-seekers :o) Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 04:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I guess that I'd add:  I was honestly sort of disappointed that I didn't get a Keepcases question during my own RfA, compared to some of the serious (and quite sensible) questions, a KC question would have been a nice distraction.  I realize that other people are bothered by them, and I respect that, but they just give me a giggle.  *shrug* --joe deckertalk to me 21:19, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Ug. Its up to seven joke questions now. jorgenev 21:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll be very blunt here. Most of the stupid/silly/stupid questions are from people who are friendly with Fluffernutter in the IRC. #wikipedia-en is not often a very serious place, which is fine for the most part, since when it needs to be serious it can be, however the stupid/silly/stupid beheavior leeching over here is not acceptable. I applaud Fluffernutter for not indulging or feeding it here.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  09:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Meh, I'm not really into all these joke questions, but as long as Fluffernutter doesn't object to them, I don't see why we should. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)