Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Guanaco 2

Vote received after end of voting period

 * 1) Support.  Gee!  I just looked at Guanaco's record.  Maybe there is a little of Dirty Harry in that record. :))  Given the "dives" that Guanaco has made his beat, I would agree with the Arbitration Committee that "Guanaco's actions as an administrator have been consistently controversial."  But, hey!  Dirty Harry has done nothing wrong in this case other than some mistakes that he has made right.  That is, if he had made those "mistakes" against me, I would count them just mistakes, not wrongs.  That is my finding in this case.  Hence, I support Guanaco without reservation.  Furthermore, I applaud the Arbitration Committee in putting Guanaco's adminship up to community vote again--so that we all look at the underlying troubling problem and come to our own conclusions within an open discussion.  ---Rednblu | Talk 08:32, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

amendment of page
I noted that two errors in user signatures had caused large parts of the page to be (a) green, and (b) small. I have thus closed those tags to make the page legible. No other changes were made. --[[User:VampWillow|Vamp:Willow]] 18:09, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I'd just like to note that this page was and remains a travesty. Snowspinner 17:38, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)