Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Happyme22

Edit count for Happyme22
User:Happyme22

run at Wed Jul 9 01:50:38 2008 GMT

Category:             15 Help:                 2 Image talk:           5 Image:                47 Mainspace             7630 Portal talk:          6 Portal:               2 Talk:                 1555 Template talk:        37 Template:             124 User talk:            1225 User:                 302 Wikipedia talk:       15 Wikipedia:            794 avg edits per page    6.97 earliest              04:13, 21 February 2007 number of unique pages 1686 total                 11759

2007/2 179   2007/3  896   2007/4  645   2007/5  740   2007/6  756   2007/7  103   2007/8  534   2007/9  697   2007/10 1112   2007/11 865   2007/12 809   2008/1  715   2008/2  414   2008/3  691   2008/4  864   2008/5  942   2008/6  669   2008/7  128

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 1802 [2]Ronald Reagan 589 [3]Nancy Reagan 228 [4]Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan 219 [5]George H. W. Bush 218 [6]Pat Nixon 163 [7]Dick Cheney 131 [8]Richard Nixon 126 [9]Jeremiah Wright controversy 123 [10]Ronald Reagan Presidential Library 122 [11]Iran-Contra affair 93  [12]Presidency of Ronald Reagan 90  [13]George W. Bush 83  [14]Laura Bush 81  [15]White House 77  [16]Margaret Thatcher

Talk: 554 [17]Ronald Reagan 106 [18]Nancy Reagan 100 [19]Jeremiah Wright controversy 69 [20]Dick Cheney 56 [21]John McCain 54 [22]White House 49 [23]Barack Obama 43 [24]George H. W. Bush 36 [25]George W. Bush 33 [26]Richard Nixon 23 [27]Ronald Reagan Presidential Library 22 [28]Jimmy Carter 21 [29]Margaret Thatcher 18 [30]Iran-Contra affair/GA1 17 [31]Iran-Contra affair

Category: 5 [32]Reagan Administration 4 [33]Reagan administration 3 [34]Deaths from Alzheimer's disease

Image: 3 [35]Golden Girls title card.jpg 3 [36]EESPEECH.jpg 3 [37]The Reagan Diaries.jpg 3 [38]Funeral Service for Pat Nixon.jpg 3 [39]American Life Ronald Reagan.jpg 2 [40]Nancy Reagan at Republican debate January 30, 2008.jpg 2 [41]SM 20 years logo.jpg 2 [42]DMadison.jpg 2 [43]REAGANball.jpg 2 [44]REAGANcabinet.jpg 2 [45]Reagan baseball.jpg 2 [46]RRNRREAGAN.jpg 2 [47]REAGANLIMO.jpg

Image talk: 2 [48]Vietcapturejm01.jpg

Portal talk: 6 [49]United States

Template: 52 [50]Ronald Reagan 19 [51]Infobox presidential library 10 [52]Infobox presidential library/doc 6 [53]Cold War 5 [54]Barack Obama 4 [55]GA number 4 [56]USstatements 2 [57]John McCain 2 [58]Cold War figures 2 [59]Infobox First Lady 2 [60]Rudy Giuliani 2 [61]RFChist list

Template talk: 23 [62]Did you know 4 [63]Barack Obama 3 [64]Infobox Officeholder 2 [65]John McCain 2 [66]Infobox Election

User: 204 [67]Happyme22 36 [68]Happyme22/Sandbox 35 [69]Happyme22/admin coaching 4  [70]Happyme22/monobook.js   3   [71]Happyme22/Archive 2 3  [72]Happyme22/userboxes/conservative 2  [73]Zzyzx11/Archive18 2  [74]Chiefmartinez 2  [75]Some Guy421/UserlikesReagan 2  [76]Mathiasrex 2  [77]Arcayne 2  [78]Reganwherearthou

User talk: 136 [79]Happyme22 125 [80]Arcayne 64 [81]SandyGeorgia 24 [82]Info999 24 [83]GearedBull 22 [84]Happyme22/Sandbox 21 [85]Southern Texas 20 [86]Happyme22/Sandbox/Archive 1 16 [87]Tvoz 16 [88]Realist2 15 [89]Awadewit 15 [90]LordHarris 13 [91]Josiah Rowe 13 [92]Wasted Time R   13  [93]Aude

Wikipedia: 118 [94]Featured article candidates/Nancy Reagan/archive2 59 [95]Requests for page protection 59 [96]Featured article candidates/Ronald Reagan 35 [97]Featured article candidates/Ronald Reagan/archive3 30 [98]Good article nominations 29 [99]Peer review/Ronald Reagan/archive4 28 [100]Featured article candidates/Nancy Reagan 24 [101]Featured article candidates/Ronald Reagan/archive5 22 [102]Today's featured article/requests 17 [103]Featured article review/Barack Obama/archive3 12 [104]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 11 [105]Featured article candidates/Cold War 11 [106]Featured article candidates 10 [107]Wikiquette alerts 10 [108]Articles for deletion/Nelle Wilson Reagan

Wikipedia talk: 7 [109]Today's featured article/requests 3 [110]WikiProject California 2 [111]Manual of Style (biographies)

If there were any problems, please [112]email Interiot or post at  [113]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 01:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC).

OhanaUnited's oppose

 * 1) Oppose. Sorry, I can't let a person to become an admin if he is not going to do his part to prevent someone from using his account. While he could say it's his brother or young cousin who did it, there's no way to proof his innocence. OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Ohana, and thanks for addressing your concerns. I am a bit perplexed, however, that you feel that I was part of this act. I compeltely rewrote both the Ronald and Nancy Reagan articles, so the two edits (here and here, respectively) hopefully speak for themselves and demonstrate that they were not something that I did, or was proud of. I take this project very, very seriously and the events were very unfortunate. Happyme22 (talk) 22:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Happy, he didn't accuse you of doing it. But rather states that we don't know who did it.  While AGF would have us accept the fact that it was family members at a closed environment as you describe, he is concerned that may not be truthful and that somebody made those edits on a public terminal at a library or something.--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 00:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Umm, no. Just so we're clear here people - Ohana actually doesn't believe Happy. His position is untenable. He's assuming bad faith with this remark: "there's no way to proof his innocence". If that's his stance, that's his stance, but let's not try to paint a different picture than what was said.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 00:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed; the word "innocence" is the key word here. Happy, I can imagine how bad it must be to see your own account vandalize one of your FAs, with some FAs of my own. I cringed just now when I clicked on both diffs. Gary King ( talk ) 00:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You are correct... I was trying to find a way to justify his statement and AGF on it and on his intentions...--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 03:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This is frankly a little silly. I saw the first time that the brother used the account, and it was so unlike HappyMe22's style of writing (I had just come off dealing with a sockfarmer, so looking for those sorts of details was still fresh in my mind), that I immediately asked Hap if someone had hacked his account. The guy has over ten thousand solid edits and Ohana wants to assume that the maker of two separate, meticulous FAs is lying to us? That is an extraordinary and unreasonable lack of good faith, I think. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  10:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Security is a key issue. And you guys know that compromised accounts (including admins) can be blocked? OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * read the entire sentemce: as an emergency measure yes. This is done because we realize that people's accounts may become compromised by accident.  It doesn't say that an admin should be sumarily desysopped or is grounds for desysopping.  An admin can be blocked for a number of other reasons... incivility, 3RR, etc.  But that doesn't mean that we should deny adminship to everybody because there is the possibility of their being blocked.--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 18:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it is absurd that one user is certifiably certain what another user meant with their comment. Talk about not AGF! It is merely a statement of the evidence. An action took place that Happy was responsible for; Happy is a trusted editor so his explanation was accepted -- however, no undeniable proof was offered to back Happy's assertion of innocence. Why? NONE CAN BE! That's why WP has the AGF code of conduct, so we don't need undeniable proof. But AGF does not protect against demented psychopaths with split personalities, FOR EXAMPLE. (I capitalized "for example" so no one assumes that I clearly mean Happy is mentally unstable.) Just because someone knows someone online does not mean you know someone. How do you know I am not Happy and created this account just to mess with all of you? YA DON'T. That's why it is so important to address this in an RfA. Disgusting. --Tombstone (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This is not the first time Ohana has blatantly assumed bad faith of candidates and made poor opposition comments. For instance; Requests for adminship/Philosopher, Requests for adminship/Lady Aleena, Requests for adminship/Wisdom89 3. —Giggy 05:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)