Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ironholds 4

General user info Username: Ironholds User groups: autoreviewer, rollbacker First edit: Apr 02, 2008 19:46:10 Unique articles edited: 17,913 Average edits per page: 2.40 Total edits (including deleted): 42,941 Deleted edits: 9,763 Live edits: 33,178

Namespace totals Article	    10848	32.70% Talk	     1231	3.71% User	     2948	8.89% User talk   12030	36.26% Wikipedia    4753	14.33% Wikipedia talk 776	2.34% File	       91	0.27% File talk	 1	0.00% Template	90	0.27% Template talk 349	1.05% Category	53	0.16% Category talk	 1	0.00% Portal	        5	0.02% Portal talk	 2	0.01%

Month counts 2008/04	1390	2008/05	1960	2008/06	2359	2008/07	1855	2008/08	1419	2008/09	797	2008/10	1315	2008/11	1730	2008/12	2102	2009/01	1888	2009/02	1439	2009/03	1343	2009/04	1973	2009/05	1992	2009/06	1307	2009/07	921	2009/08	2575	2009/09	1874	2009/10	928	2009/11	667	2009/12	1312	2010/01	32

Logs Pages moved: 268 Pages patrolled: 26647 Files uploaded: 33

Top edited articles Article

* 166 - Norman_Birkett,_1st_Baron_Birkett * 144 - Courts_and_Legal_Services_Act_1990 * 110 - Gray's_Inn * 98 - William_Murray,_1st_Earl_of_Mansfield * 89 - Contracts_(Rights_of_Third_Parties)_Act_1999 * 81 - Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning * 58 - List_of_Stewards_of_the_Manor_of_Northstead * 53 - Chief_Justice_of_the_Common_Pleas * 38 - Court_of_Common_Pleas_(England) * 36 - Pure_Reason_Revolution

Talk

* 26 - Gray's_Inn * 20 - Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning * 16 - Claud_Schuster,_1st_Baron_Schuster/GA1 * 12 - Contracts_(Rights_of_Third_Parties)_Act_1999 * 12 - Bonar_Law * 11 - English_contract_law * 11 - Royal_Society/GA1 * 10 - Pure_Reason_Revolution * 9 - William_Garrow * 8 - Norman_Birkett,_1st_Baron_Birkett

User

* 659 - Ironholds/Sandbox3 * 482 - Ironholds/Sandbox * 354 - Ironholds/CP * 200 - Ironholds/Sandbox2 * 149 - Ironholds/header * 120 - Ironholds/fe * 108 - Ironholds/DYK * 81 - Ironholds/ucta * 71 - Ironholds/bonar * 69 - Ironholds/page

User talk

* 242 - Ironholds * 73 - Max_Mux * 67 - Choess/Archive4 * 52 - Wikidea * 41 - Ecoleetage * 40 - PirateSmackK * 34 - Bencherlite * 30 - PMDrive1061 * 26 - Stilltim * 26 - CultureDrone

Wikipedia

* 298 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents * 223 - Usernames_for_administrator_attention * 169 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism * 92 - Miscellany_for_deletion * 67 - Requests_for_adminship/Ironholds_3 * 45 - Administrators'_noticeboard * 43 - Good_article_nominations * 42 - Featured_article_candidates/Norman_Birkett,_1st_Ba... * 35 - Requests_for_adminship/Ironholds_2 * 31 - WikiProject_Awards_and_prizes

Wikipedia talk

* 204 - Requests_for_adminship * 63 - WikiProject_Law * 62 - Development_committee * 48 - WikiProject_Awards_and_prizes * 38 - Requests_for_comment/Collect * 38 - Notability_(law) * 37 - Notability_(people) * 20 - Requests_for_adminship/Ironholds_2 * 16 - Notability * 13 - WikiProject_Mammals

File

* 5 - Violet-dp.jpg * 3 - Nuremberg_judges.jpg * 3 - Ramsay_MacDonald_rightfacing.29588.jpg * 3 - Birkett.jpg * 3 - Gray_Inn_Badge.jpg * 2 - Superior_volume_one_cover.jpg * 2 - New_years_day.jpg * 2 - 1677_Gray's_Inn.jpg * 1 - Amine_-_My_Girl_single_cover.jpg * 1 - Stardust_Memory_title_card.jpg

File talk

* 1 - Muslim_distribution.png

Template

* 10 - Speaker_of_the_British_House_of_Commons * 5 - Announcements/Community_bulletin_board * 4 - Bot * 4 - RoySoc * 4 - PRRevolution * 3 - Shell_Professors_of_Chemical_Engineering * 3 - CourtsEnglandWales * 2 - KidsTVBlocksUSA * 2 - Meetup * 2 - Chadwick_Professors_of_Civil_Engineering

Template talk

* 346 - Did_you_know * 1 - AFC_status * 1 - Italic_title * 1 - CourtsEnglandWales

Category

* 2 - Royal_Medal_winners * 2 - British_surgical_organisations * 2 - High_Sheriffs_of_Anglesey * 2 - Surgical_organizations * 2 - High_Sheriffs_of_Sussex * 2 - British_royal_commissions * 2 - High_Sheriffs_of_Buckinghamshire * 1 - High_Sheriffs_of_Gloucestershire * 1 - WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles_particip... * 1 - High_Sheriffs_of_Cumberland

Category talk

* 1 - Musicians

Portal

* 1 - Contents/Overviews * 1 - Geography * 1 - Contents/Categorical_index/Philosophy_and_thinking * 1 - Pervasive_Developmental_Disorders/Intro * 1 - Law

Portal talk

* 1 - Contents * 1 - Law

Bickering moved from under Lara's support

 * Caspian, you seriously made me lol. Thank you for that. Do you offer a free translation service by chance, or do I need to go flag down someone from WikiProject Linguistics? Bullzeye contribs 05:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * "This is Bullzeye. He is kind of a bastard"; Ah at least, I totally agree with this self-introduction. :-)--Caspian blue 05:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, I'm pretty open about being a bit of a WP:DICK. Where's the disclaimer on your page, Caspian? ;-) Bullzeye contribs 05:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please don't be so modest; You're master, while I'm just a mere editor who gets trolled by you. Happy new year:-) --Caspian blue 06:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm master, huh? If you are say so. Happy new year to you as well. Btw, if you've got time, I teach lessons on the proper use of strike-out when editing comments which have already been responded to. It's about 17 steps before the segment on "angry voting in RfAs". Bullzeye contribs 06:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahem, I think DNFTT is a more useful tip to me in dealing with the master, cheers! --Caspian blue 06:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, if you've been watching Doctor Who this Christmas... Sceptre (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Bullzeye, please think before you post. That comment did nothing but escalate the issue. Caspian has the right to his opinion, however much you disagree with it. &mdash;Dark 12:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And Caspian hasn't been the model for civility either, with his retaliatory comments. It's New Years guys; let's not start the year with a flame war. &mdash;Dark 12:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

About Average White Dork's questions
As has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of, is there any reason why their questions should remain? They contributed almost half of the questions, most of which have only little relevance to adminship.

Is there any reason why I (or someone else) shouldn't be bold and just remove them? --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Though I don't see much actual reason to remove them (as I noted in the Discussion section of the RfA, when someone else asked), if they are removed, please leave some sort of indication to explain the broken numbering for the questions (and, above all, do not change the question numbers, as that'll screw up every !vote that references an answer). EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 18:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There are far too many questions here as it is, and most are irrelevant. The fact it comes from an apparent abusive sockpuppet should make it obvious that they ought to be removed.  Majorly  talk  18:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * My attitude is one mired largely by laziness; as long as the numbering is maintained, I don't care. :) EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 19:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Some of the questions don't appear too bizzare. I'd let IH decide, if he wants to, he can collapse them. -- Narson ~  Talk  • 19:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that's a good solution - the collapsing is important, so that the numbering remains the same. I will leave it for IH to decide on this - for what it's worth, I think they should be --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 19:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I've just seen IH's comment on this ("They don't really bother me, to be honest"), so I'm happy to let this go. I've already labelled the first 2 sets of questions as being from a sockpuppet (someone else did the 3rd set), so anyone reading the questions can use their judgement on this matter. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 19:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I labeled the third set, didn't realize there were two other sets until after editing, then adopted EVula's attitude (too lazy to care). I think it's important that readers of the RfA know the questions are from a banned user, but, sure IH can decide what to do with them. I'm generally for deleting crap from banned users, though. They consume too much attention on wikipedia already. -- IP69.226.103.13 |  Talk about me.  19:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)